Teams

Phung

2022 St. Marys Tri-Level Mixed · St Marys Tri-Level Mixed 4.0,3.5,3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-12-17vs MaierLost 01
L#2 DoublesThomas Swann / Nhi Phung vs Joseph Taylor / Danielle Gorman4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-12-07vs BergenLost 01
L#2 DoublesNhi Phung / Alan Griffin vs Lori Romanek / Ahmed Abdellatif4-6, 3-6
2022-12-01vs BergenLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Cui / Maria Birnkammer vs Trey Bergen / Lori Romanek6-7, 1-6
2022-11-17vs BergenWon 10
W#2 DoublesNhi Phung / Michael Cui vs Lori Romanek / Ahmed Abdellatif6-2, 6-4
2022-11-05vs BergenLost 01
L#2 DoublesNhi Phung / Michael Cui vs Rob Slawson / Sonia Roy3-6, 3-6
2022-10-29vs MaierLost 01
L#2 DoublesThomas Swann / Maria Birnkammer vs Kevin Findley / Megan Gladwell1-6, 6-7
2022-10-11vs BergenWon 10
W#2 DoublesMaria Birnkammer / Michael Cui vs Becky Lebow / Trey Bergen1-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for St Marys Tri-Level Mixed 4.0,3.5,3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Clayton Coker
published 4
3.71
Diana Heinze
published 4
3.70
Bruce Willhide
published 4
3.66
Jason Wynn
published
3.64
Marissa Romanek
published
3.43
Thomas Swann
published
3.42
Maria Birnkammer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Nhi Phung
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Patricia Louden
published
2.93
Sabra Szczyglowski
published
2.70
Catherine Wynne
published 3
Michael Cui
published
Sara Vance
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Clayton Coker
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Diana Heinze
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Bruce Willhide
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Jason Wynn
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
Marissa Romanek
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
Thomas Swann
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.43
3.5
Maria Birnkammer
97W–141L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Nhi Phung
88W–65L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
Patricia Louden
12W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
2.99
Sabra Szczyglowski
32W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
2.93
3
Catherine Wynne
12W–21L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Michael Cui
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara Vance
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.