Teams

LAGUNA CREEK 40AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-02-22vs ANTELOPE COMMUNITY PK 40AW3.5AWon 31
W#1 DoublesMichelle Christensen / Gina Davis vs Susie O'Brien / Michelle Valenzuela6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJoAnn Jaschke vs Kathi Peterson0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesHeather Craig / Bridget Lewis vs Rhona Wu / Vinh Sae6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesYoung Jensen / Jane Fieldhouse vs Michele Reyes / Brenda Romero6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Cynthia Corral
published 3.5
3.45
Heather Craig
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Young Jensen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Karen Cesar
published
3.35
Jane Fieldhouse
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
JoAnn Jaschke
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.25
Suzanna Gee
published
3.24
Jenifer Coston
published
3.19
Michelle Christensen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Bridget Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Leesa Linn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JoAnn Jaschke + Cynthia Corral5166% games+14.3% vs expected
Michelle Christensen + Cynthia Corral3356% games+6.1% vs expected
Leesa Linn + Heather Craig5450% games−3.8% vs expected
Michelle Christensen + Leesa Linn123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cynthia Corral
26W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
Heather Craig
14W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Young Jensen
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Karen Cesar
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
Jane Fieldhouse
25W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.35
JoAnn Jaschke
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
Suzanna Gee
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Jenifer Coston
7W–18L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Michelle Christensen
12W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Bridget Lewis
3W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
Leesa Linn
17W–18L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.