Teams

WOCC Moehling

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-14vs Woodlake CookseyWon 10
W#1 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Heather Drew vs Peggy McElgunn / Susan Zielinski3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-09vs ACAC CallaghanLost 01
L#3 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Heather Drew vs Sandra Neumann / Judy Duke1-6, 1-6
2023-06-02vs Kings Charter RamserLost 01
L#1 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Laura Vetter vs Donna Mourtzakis / Brenda Tyson6-7, 4-6
2023-05-31vs TDC LongWon 10
W#1 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Tia Thomas vs Robin Cox / Michele Limoges6-0, 6-3
2023-05-26vs Ridgetop KrawitzLost 01
L#1 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Tia Thomas vs Allison Purcell / Anna Horner1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-05-24vs HCC StinsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather Drew / Darlene Moehling vs Susan Poulos / Beth Stinson6-7, 1-6
2023-05-15vs TDC BakerWon 10
W#1 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Tia Thomas vs Annette Vignone / Robin Zachwieja6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Darlene Moehling
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.46
Tia Thomas
published
3.38
Heather Drew
published 3.5
3.37
Laura Vetter
published
3.22
Jenny Norfleet
published
3.10
Jenefer Williams
published
2.98
Leslie Gayne
published
Liz Benedetti
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Vetter + Heather Drew2356% games+0.1% vs expected
Jenefer Williams + Laura Vetter123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darlene Moehling
113W–77L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.88
Tia Thomas
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Heather Drew
13W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.38
Laura Vetter
20W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
Jenny Norfleet
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.22
Jenefer Williams
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.10
Leslie Gayne
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.98
Liz Benedetti
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.