Teams

TULSA: Jones/LF

2025 TUL ADULT 65 & Over League · 8.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 8.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TULSA: Jones/LF000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Pam Rahhal
published
3.70
Patti Burton
published
3.46
Ginger Wade
published
3.43
Cynthia Causey
published 4
3.42
Gail Gillock
published
3.25
Betsy Bryce
published 4
Deborah Mocnik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Sandy Jones
published
Karen Orr
published
Kathy Carleton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Jones + Cynthia Causey5944% games−7.1% vs expected
Betsy Bryce + Pam Rahhal303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pam Rahhal
150W–65L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Patti Burton
77W–58L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Ginger Wade
39W–45L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46
4
Cynthia Causey
20W–32L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.43
Gail Gillock
45W–46L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
4
Betsy Bryce
142W–101L career · no lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.25
3.5
Deborah Mocnik
23W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Jones
25W–45L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.16
Karen Orr
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Carleton
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.