Teams

SD 4.5 Balboa TC (3:1)/ Jordan

2025 Adult 40 & Over Winter - SD WD · SD - Women - 4.5 WD

9 players · average NTRP 4.40 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-25vs SD 4.5 UCRC (3:1)/ DoyleWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatheryn Hammond / Ruth Young vs Cynthia Delgado / Sundi Olson6-2, 6-4
2025-03-04vs SD 4.5 UCRC (3:1)/ FitzgeraldWon 20
W#1 DoublesJanet McLees / Ruth Young vs Monika Wimmer / Val Zabaco4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Gay / Katheryn Hammond vs Linda la Terza / Mindy Pfenning6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-18vs SD 4.5 Coronado Cays (3:1)/ WarrenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNarelle Pettee / Janet McLees vs Jada Cade / Colleen Warren3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesRuth Young / Katheryn Hammond vs Katerina Hart / Jessica Cunningham6-3, 6-1
2025-02-04vs SD 4.5 Barnes TC (4 @9am)/ RepettiLost 01
L#1 DoublesNarelle Pettee / Janet McLees vs Alison Hagopian / Carolynne Yen3-6, 2-6
2025-01-28vs SoCal/Lock/40&Over4.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesRuth Young / Janet McLees vs Dolores Ilko / Shelby Rubin2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesValveta Jones / Beatriz MuzquizdeGillespie vs Kellie Jaquez / Kristie Alva3-6, 2-6
2025-01-21vs SD 4.5 SDTRC (3:1)/ OttLost 02
L#1 DoublesRuth Young / Janet McLees vs Sarina Lynn / Carol Smith6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMasako Beppu / Beatriz MuzquizdeGillespie vs Whitney Ginter / Ashley Stone5-7, 1-6
2025-01-07vs SD 4.5 UCRC (3:1)/ FitzgeraldLost 02
L#1 DoublesRuth Young / Katheryn Hammond vs Monika Wimmer / Val Zabaco5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBeatriz MuzquizdeGillespie / Elizabeth Jordan vs Jennifer FIelds / Andrea Peterson2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 4.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Katheryn Hammond
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.10
Camila Gill
published 4.5
3.99
Janet McLees
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Beatriz MuzquizdeGillespie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.71
Carol Gay
published 4
Pamela Seggerman
published
Ruth Young
published
Valveta Jones
published
Yoko Anderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katheryn Hammond + Janet McLees1445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Katheryn Hammond
13W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Camila Gill
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Janet McLees
44W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.99
4.5
Beatriz MuzquizdeGillespie
15W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.92
4
Carol Gay
2W–14L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Pamela Seggerman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ruth Young
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Valveta Jones
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yoko Anderson
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.