Teams

Westwood-West

2024 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 6.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.29 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-10vs Dominion Club - DykesWon 10
W#3 DoublesKacie Painter / Gareth Mancini vs Christopher Limoges / Erica Bragg6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-11-02vs Twin Hickory SaxenaWon 10
W#2 DoublesKacie Painter / Ken West vs Tarun Luthra / Sugandha Agarwal2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-26vs ACAC RalstonLost 01
L#2 DoublesCaren Payne / Joseph Jones vs Anne Townsend / Stephen Chandler2-6, 3-6
2024-10-19vs ACAC LewisLost 01
L#3 DoublesCaren Payne / Gareth Mancini vs Martinique Kandl / Will Benton3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-10-12vs Kanawha6.5 - WareWon 10
W#1 DoublesKacie Painter / Ken West vs Eric Miller / Krista Quinby7-5, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Kacie Painter
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Kirby Fields
published
3.37
Jessica Parrent
published
3.36
James Mullahy
published 3.5
3.35
Procter Fishburne
published
3.31
Jamie McLeod
published 3.5
3.25
Elizabeth West
published 3.5
3.20
Sarah Thomas
published
3.19
Patricia Bishop
published
3.08
Joseph Jones
published
3.08
Sam Berg
published
3.01
Emilie Raymond
published 3
2.99
Caren Payne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.94
Ken West
published
2.91
Gareth Mancini
published 3
2.87
Julia Baker
published
2.72
George Bishop
published 3
Lauren King
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Mullahy + Jessica Parrent404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kacie Painter
199W–63L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.55
Kirby Fields
11W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.38
Jessica Parrent
27W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
James Mullahy
22W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
Procter Fishburne
17W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Jamie McLeod
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Elizabeth West
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Sarah Thomas
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.20
Patricia Bishop
9W–19L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Joseph Jones
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.08
Sam Berg
29W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
Emilie Raymond
29W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.01
3.5
Caren Payne
111W–68L career · 2 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.99
Ken West
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Gareth Mancini
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.91
Julia Baker
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
George Bishop
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
2.72
Lauren King
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.