Teams

Sun City - M. Huntington

2024 Hillsborough Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-04-05vs Hills/Vickers/65&Over6.0WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDebra Lowe / Karen Montgomery vs Cynthia Ciarpelli / Karen Cleland7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBarbara Dolan / Sharon Lucas vs Hannah Gabora / Pamela Woodham3-6, 1-6
2024-03-15vs Apollo Beach - N. MatuszakWon 10
W#1 DoublesDebra Lowe / Karen Montgomery vs Kathleen Gafarian / Lynn Malarz5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2024-03-01vs Hills/Vickers/65&Over6.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesDebra Lowe / Mary Huntington vs Pamela Woodham / Cynthia Ciarpelli4-6, 2-6
2024-02-23vs Apollo Beach - N. MatuszakWon 10
W#1 DoublesDebra Lowe / Margaret McGillivray vs Nancy Matuszak / Dorothy Flair6-2, 6-0
2024-02-09vs Hills/Vickers/65&Over6.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesDebra Lowe / Charlotte Wood vs Carmen Heggen / Anne Stafford1-6, 4-6
2024-02-02vs Apollo Beach - N. MatuszakSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDebra Lowe / Charlotte Wood vs Renee Hovden / Kathleen Gafarian1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDenarae Kelly / Sharon Lucas vs Juanita Vila / Dorothy Flair6-2, 6-3
2024-01-19vs Hills/Vickers/65&Over6.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarcia Schaefer / Charlotte Wood vs Hannah Gabora / Karen Cleland6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMary Huntington / Debra Lowe vs Carmen Heggen / Anne Stafford2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSharon Lucas / Sharon Woodruff vs Cynthia Ciarpelli / Pamela Woodham2-6, 3-6
2024-01-18vs Apollo Beach - N. MatuszakWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Huntington / Debra Lowe vs Renee Hovden / Kathleen Gafarian6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Marcia Schaefer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Debra Lowe
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.33
Barbara Dolan
published 3
Kathleen Norton
published
Mary Huntington
published
Sharon Lucas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Woodruff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Lowe + Kathleen Norton404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marcia Schaefer
15W–27L career · 1 line in 2024
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Debra Lowe
57W–46L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Barbara Dolan
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
2.33
Kathleen Norton
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Margaret McGillivray
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Huntington
6W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sharon Lucas
39W–70L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sharon Woodruff
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.