Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Leiken

2023 Fall Indoor League-Saturday · 3.5W

17 players · average NTRP 3.62 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-12-16vs Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna/BastianLost 12
L#1 Female DoublesEmilee Hurley / Jessica Spencer vs Jane Chandramouli / Sherrie Hatch5-7, 4-3, 1-0
L#2 Female DoublesSophie Bellina / Amy Dominguez vs Miranda Tilley / Gelyn Pauly4-6, 3-6
W#3 Female DoublesMadelyn Totland / Dawn Farrell vs Delia Bayna / Alejandra Gonzalez6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-12-09vs Sports Mall-LyonSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesKatie Leikin / Madelyn Totland vs Debra Knowlton / Claudine Finlay6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 Female DoublesEmilee Hurley / Jennifer Kane vs Kelly Wilcox / DeeAnn Henderson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-12-04vs Ogden-MouldingLost 02
L#2 Female DoublesNicole Chase / Rebecca England vs Jacki Joseph / Betty Peterson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 Female DoublesDawn Farrell / Cozette Caron vs Janelle Lee / Kaye Moulding6-2, 3-5, 0-1
2023-11-11vs Liberty Park Tennis-Stacey/EwingSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesMadelyn Totland / Katie Leikin vs Jennie Stacey / Lisa Ewing6-4, 2-5, 1-0
W#2 Female DoublesKristina Magee / Emilee Hurley vs Hayley Shaffer / Sara Ray6-4, 4-3
2023-11-04vs Liberty Park Tennis-DaySplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesNicole Chase / Katie Leikin vs Molly Adams / Sophie Jackson2-6, 4-6
W#2 Female DoublesSophie Bellina / Stephanie Benton vs Maria Pettit / Kassie Torres6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Emilee Hurley
usually #2 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Annette Knight
published 4
3.54
Katie Leikin
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Kristina Magee
published
3.42
Stephanie Benton
published
3.35
Nicole Chase
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Cozette Caron
published 3.5
3.24
Jessica Spencer
published
3.20
Madelyn Totland
published
3.14
Dawn Farrell
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Rebecca England
published
2.96
Amy Dominguez
published 3.5
2.83
Shelby Rose
published
Sophie Bellina
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
Brooke McCloskey
published
Hatty Ostrowski
published
Jennifer Kane
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Spencer + Kristina Magee4257% games+4.8% vs expected
Madelyn Totland + Katie Leikin11954% games+3.5% vs expected
Stephanie Benton + Nicole Chase7261% games+3.3% vs expected
Dawn Farrell + Sophie Bellina3548% games+0.0% vs expected
Amy Dominguez + Nicole Chase5153% games−0.3% vs expected
Dawn Farrell + Rebecca England3248% games−1.3% vs expected
Katie Leikin + Kristina Magee4159% gamesnot enough data
Brooke McCloskey + Dawn Farrell134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emilee Hurley
95W–51L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Annette Knight
58W–66L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.62
4
Katie Leikin
103W–125L career · 3 lines in 2023
38%61%<1%
3.54
Kristina Magee
38W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.49
Stephanie Benton
57W–48L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Nicole Chase
50W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Cozette Caron
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jessica Spencer
20W–20L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.24
Madelyn Totland
36W–44L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Dawn Farrell
127W–111L career · 2 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.14
Rebecca England
109W–96L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.03
3.5
Amy Dominguez
17W–16L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.96
Shelby Rose
31W–45L career · no lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
2.83
3
Sophie Bellina
41W–46L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Brooke McCloskey
12W–71L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Hatty Ostrowski
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Kane
21W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.