Teams

NPratt (Blakeney)

2026 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-27vs ABlanton (Charlotte CC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Pratt / Lisa Darfler vs Abby Blanton / Austin Szyperski0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesErin Colonna / Brooke Malley vs Catherine Ruth Kelly / Emily Tindel2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Talmage / Laurey Cosentino vs Frances Hyde / Stephanie Fountaine1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-04-20vs JMurphy (PCC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Pratt / Lisa Darfler vs Lisa Duggins / Michele Messmer1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesErin Colonna / Brooke Malley vs Monica Smith / Julia Murphy2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDiane DeMus / Patti Glassburner vs Melissa O'Brien / Sumi Gerry1-6, 0-6
2026-04-13vs PSweeney (FCC)Lost 04
L#1 DoublesNancy Pratt / Christine Lee vs Christina McDonald / Deb Sokol0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke Malley / Patti Glassburner vs Meghan Rawlings / Joanne Hurley1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesDiane DeMus vs Patty Sweeney0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Darfler / Erin Colonna vs Renu Renu Gill / Danielle Fricke2-6, 1-6
2026-04-01vs EJack (Charlotte CC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Pratt / Caroline Campbell vs Elizabeth Jack / Quinerly Cowden2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAnne Talmage vs Mckay Mansmann0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLaurey Cosentino / Diane DeMus vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-03-24vs AEagan/SSamuelson (WSRC)Lost 04
L#1 DoublesLaurey Cosentino / Anne Talmage vs Amanda Eagan / Savannah Samuelson0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Lee / Erin Colonna vs Aleksandra Roemig / Kimberly Borans2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesHelen Wood vs Renata Riechelmann2-6, 3-4
L#3 DoublesNancy Pratt / Brooke Malley vs Kym Armbruster / Lori Holman2-6, 1-6
2026-03-23vs IMcLeod (Carmel)Lost 04
L#1 DoublesLaurey Cosentino / Erin Colonna vs Morgan Peterson / Lindsey Eich0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke Malley / Nancy Pratt vs Landis Fuller / Jessie Zande1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesDiane DeMus vs Danielle Waters1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCaroline Campbell / Anne Talmage vs Elizabeth Magan / Ashleigh Herlocker1-6, 0-6
2026-03-09vs ABlanton (Charlotte CC)Lost 05
L#1 DoublesAlisa Hood / Lisa Darfler vs Margie Gately / Stephanie Hanson2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHelen Wood vs Austin Szyperski2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesErin Colonna / Caroline Campbell vs Catherine Ruth Kelly / Emily Tindel1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesDiane DeMus vs Kerry Baldwin1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Talmage / Laurey Cosentino vs Stephanie Fountaine / Laurens Threlkeld3-6, 2-6
2026-03-02vs JMurphy (PCC)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesLisa Darfler / Caroline Campbell vs Cassandra Greco / Monica Smith0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesHelen Wood vs Mary Kirby2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrooke Malley / Alisa Hood vs Michele Messmer / Linda Williams1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLaurey Cosentino / Anne Talmage vs Elizabeth Suppa / Sumi Gerry1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.23 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.59
Helen Wood
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.56
Laurey Cosentino
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.46
Brooke Malley
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.29
Lisa Darfler
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.24
Erin Colonna
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.10
Nancy Pratt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.09
Diane DeMus
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.03
Patti Glassburner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.00
Alisa Hood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.96
Anne Talmage
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane DeMus + Anne Talmage044 matchesnot enough data
Laurey Cosentino + Anne Talmage044 matchesnot enough data
Erin Colonna + Brooke Malley033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Helen Wood
1W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%26%74%
2.59
Laurey Cosentino
2W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
3
Brooke Malley
0W–11L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.46
Lisa Darfler
3W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
Erin Colonna
2W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Nancy Pratt
1W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Diane DeMus
17W–75L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Patti Glassburner
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
2.5
Alisa Hood
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Anne Talmage
3W–14L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.