Teams

Reding/LR/Reb

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-28vs ATA Team/BPWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Freeman / Danele Poole vs Karmen Bound / Courtney Russenberger6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLeigh Ann Raper / Eleanor James vs Liz Webb / Hayley Hackett6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKelli Rawn / Kaitlin Cockerell vs Kinlee Baker / Jessica Buchman6-4, 6-4
2026-07-16vs Padgett/Watts/Alexander/BPLost 03
L#1 DoublesDanele Poole / Maya Goree vs Haylee Scott / Sarah Sisco6-4, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSiobahn Hruby / Kelli Rawn vs Brandi Watts / Holly Taylor2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Bobbitt / Rachel Hamner vs Mellisa Bryan / Karla Karwoski0-6, 2-6
2026-06-30vs Jones/LR/RebLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Claire McLaurin / Kaitlin Cockerell vs Hayden Finley / Elizabeth Gillispie6-2, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSara Koger / Yan Sun vs Anne McPherson / Kaitlen Stewart3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMaya Goree / Holly Sessions vs Katie Hicks / Jaclyn Bracey2-6, 6-4
2026-06-22vs Webster/CON/RebWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Freeman / Danele Poole vs Molly Scott / Yerenia Adame Hernandez6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHolly Reding / Yan Sun vs Megan Wells / Joyce Adame6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Claire McLaurin / Kelli Rawn vs Jessica Turner / Abbey Laureano6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Holly Sessions
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Maya Goree
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Danele Poole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Holly Reding
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Eleanor James
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Kelli Rawn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Siobahn Hruby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Leigh Ann Raper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Sara Koger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Jennifer Bobbitt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Mary Claire McLaurin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.37
Kaitlin Cockerell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Rachel Hamner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Yan Sun
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Claire McLaurin + Kelli Rawn12366% games+13.5% vs expected
Siobahn Hruby + Holly Reding213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Holly Sessions
16W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
Maya Goree
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Danele Poole
17W–10L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
Holly Reding
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
Eleanor James
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
Kelli Rawn
33W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%6%94%
2.72
Siobahn Hruby
24W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Leigh Ann Raper
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
14%86%1%
2.65
Sara Koger
17W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Jennifer Bobbitt
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
Mary Claire McLaurin
20W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%69%31%
2.43
Kaitlin Cockerell
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
Rachel Hamner
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Yan Sun
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.