Teams

ACAC-Callaghan

2025 Richmond Combo Weekday Women · Richmond Combo Weekday 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-20vs Hermitage - FisherLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Kellner / Tatiana Smirnov vs Lauren Hutcheson / Stephanie Yablonski6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-11-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesMary Kellner / Tatiana Smirnov vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-11-13vs Westwood Caudill/DeanWon 10
W#1 DoublesTatiana Smirnov / Kristen Hornbeck vs Meghan Dexter / Jenny Sharrar6-4, 6-1
2025-11-06vs Ridgetop Scammell 6.5 WeekdayLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmanda Rice / Irene Quilez vs Lindsey Scammell / Alden McDaniel0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Funk / Lisa Smithson vs Mary Beth Scott / Suzanne Ley6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Kellner / Jessica Bufford vs Beth Stafford / Mary Douglas Rice4-6, 2-6
2025-11-04vs MTC Combo Queens 6.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesKristen Hornbeck / Kim Martin vs Allie Hannon / Jeannie Langnau6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKelley Kent / Nancy Price vs Suzanne Johnson / Nancy Reynolds6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLisa Smithson / Amanda Rice vs Anne Gilfillan / Amanda Phillips6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekday 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Nancy Price
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Jessica Bufford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Amanda Rice
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Lisa Smithson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Kristen Hornbeck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Nikki Callaghan
published
3.17
Tatiana Smirnov
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Irene Quilez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Jennifer Funk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Kelley Kent
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.80
Mary Kellner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Theresa Bartholomew
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelley Kent + Kristen Hornbeck404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Price
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.82
Jessica Bufford
28W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Amanda Rice
39W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Lisa Smithson
16W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Kristen Hornbeck
19W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%95%3%
3.25
Nikki Callaghan
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Tatiana Smirnov
136W–100L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Irene Quilez
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
Jennifer Funk
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Kelley Kent
57W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
Mary Kellner
4W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.80
Theresa Bartholomew
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.