Teams

ATC BLUE

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-09-02vs WC TEALLost 12
L#1 DoublesPeter Ludwig / Paul Ivancie vs Michael Martin / Tim Wilson5-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesTodd Groth vs Matt Bailey3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Soane / John Barron vs David Tulloch / Mathew Jones5-7, 1-6
2026-08-26vs HRCA-N GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesPeter Ludwig / Charles Schott vs Kyle Hillman / Nick Fendler4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTodd Groth vs Duane Cagle1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTed Pomeroy / John Barron vs Daniel Purdum / Stuart Foster6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-19vs HW REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesMark Soane / Todd Groth vs Matt Kraus / Glenn Tacke6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTyler Fairbairn vs Brent Lenderman0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Barron / Paul Ivancie vs Kelly Bolin / Andy Silverman5-7, 0-6
2026-08-12vs LTFC ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesCharles Schott / Peter Ludwig vs Donny Nguyen / Vageesh Kumar6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTodd Groth vs Andrew James6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPaul Ivancie / Mark Soane vs Ram Parashar / Taylor Beckstead1-6, 4-6
2026-08-05vs SS-H BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesPeter Ludwig / Paul Ivancie vs Sean Raftery / Daniel Greer6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTodd Groth vs Jack Winslow4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCharles Schott / Ted Pomeroy vs Sean Hudelson / Quinn Hudelson0-6, 6-7
2026-08-03vs HV NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesTed Pomeroy / John Barron vs Dustin Palmer / Cody Gale3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Todd Groth
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Gates Scott
published 4
3.69
Ted Pomeroy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
John Barron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Tyler Fairbairn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.53
Charles Schott
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.49
Peter Ludwig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Mark Soane
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Paul Ivancie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ted Pomeroy + Peter Ludwig1547% games+4.0% vs expected
Peter Ludwig + Mark Soane2348% games−2.6% vs expected
Ted Pomeroy + Mark Soane2336% games−5.1% vs expected
Peter Ludwig + Charles Schott224 matchesnot enough data
Ted Pomeroy + Paul Ivancie033 matchesnot enough data
Paul Ivancie + Peter Ludwig033 matchesnot enough data
Paul Ivancie + Mark Soane033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Todd Groth
12W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Gates Scott
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ted Pomeroy
9W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
John Barron
3W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
Tyler Fairbairn
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
Charles Schott
5W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
Peter Ludwig
12W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.49
Mark Soane
12W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
Paul Ivancie
7W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
3.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.