Teams

Gardendale - Zassoda

2023 B'ham Tri-Level Weeknight - 18 & Over M · W

23 players · average NTRP 2.91 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Breanna Marsh
published 3.5
3.15
Marie Zassoda
published
3.15
Marie Zassoda
published
3.02
Jonathan Kinney
published
2.97
Bradley Wilkins
published 3
2.96
Glen Speigle
published 3
2.90
Elizabeth Mcgill
published 3
2.81
Cathy Wolfe
published 3
2.73
Garima Agarwal
published 3
2.65
Jeff Gallant
published
2.62
Forrest Fletcher
published 3
2.53
Johnny Brooklere
published
2.41
Wayne Shelton
published
2.39
Jessica Fadlevich
published
2.35
Amanda Wesley
published 3
Deborah Gilbert
published 2.5
2.23
April Finney
published 2.5
2.15
Gerald Richey
published 2.5
2.09
Travis Prince
published
Jerome Arnold
published
Lainey Hardiman
published
Lance Carlson
published
Trent Fletcher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marie Zassoda + Elizabeth Mcgill0836% games−5.4% vs expected
Gerald Richey + Travis Prince044 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Gallant + Gerald Richey033 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Gallant + Travis Prince123 matchesnot enough data
Glen Speigle + Wayne Shelton213 matchesnot enough data
Gerald Richey + Johnny Brooklere213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Breanna Marsh
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Marie Zassoda
21W–58L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
Marie Zassoda
21W–58L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
Jonathan Kinney
17W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Bradley Wilkins
48W–46L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Glen Speigle
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Elizabeth Mcgill
29W–51L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Cathy Wolfe
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Garima Agarwal
20W–26L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Jeff Gallant
6W–18L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Forrest Fletcher
12W–21L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.62
Johnny Brooklere
6W–26L career · no lines in 2023
0%40%60%
2.53
Wayne Shelton
8W–27L career · no lines in 2023
0%77%23%
2.41
Jessica Fadlevich
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%80%20%
2.39
3
Amanda Wesley
15W–66L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
2.35
2.5
Deborah Gilbert
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
April Finney
0W–26L career · no lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Gerald Richey
5W–42L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Travis Prince
3W–25L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.09
Jerome Arnold
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lainey Hardiman
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lance Carlson
3W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Trent Fletcher
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.