Teams

WNCB O'Brien (ARC-S)

Tri-Level 18 & Over USTA WNC 2024 · Men 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-08vs WNCM Strysick (ARC-Crowne)Won 10
W#2 DoublesColby Caldwell / Andrew Johnson vs Brook Dorsch / Evan Klein6-1, 6-1
2024-08-01Won 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew Johnson / Colby Caldwell vs Scott MacDonald / Mason Pittman6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-07-11Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrew Johnson / Breen OBrien vs Bradley Jones / Scott MacDonald2-6, 3-6
2024-07-04vs WNCA Thompson (Brevard H&RC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew Johnson / Colby Caldwell vs Alfred Thompson / Kenneth Lovett6-1, 6-0
2024-06-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew Johnson / Colby Caldwell vs Scott MacDonald / Bradley Jones6-2, 7-6
2024-06-27vs WNCM Strysick (ARC-Crowne)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew Johnson / Colby Caldwell vs Brook Dorsch / James Zuber6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Colby Caldwell
published 4
3.60
Donald Kusz
published 4
3.49
Jefferson Bell
published
3.32
Breen OBrien
published 3.5
3.30
Andrew Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Joe Carrington
published
3.16
Dennis Mason
published 3.5
3.14
Robert Benton
published
2.86
Brad Howell
published 3
2.70
Bill Kinard
published 3
Mike Noack
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donald Kusz + Colby Caldwell2342% gamesnot enough data
Joe Carrington + Dennis Mason5071% gamesnot enough data
Bill Kinard + Breen OBrien134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Colby Caldwell
7W–26L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Donald Kusz
17W–38L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.60
Jefferson Bell
4W–20L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Breen OBrien
22W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Andrew Johnson
28W–23L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.30
Joe Carrington
44W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%10%90%
3.17
3.5
Dennis Mason
24W–6L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.16
Robert Benton
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
3
Brad Howell
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Bill Kinard
12W–37L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
Mike Noack
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.