Teams

ATC BLACK

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-05vs WP GREENLost 01
L#1 SinglesBrett Fischer vs Patrick Conta1-6, 3-6
2023-08-29vs HRCA-N ORANGEWon 10
W#2 DoublesWilliam Morris / Charles Roosevelt vs Sam Tiktin / Andrew Tiktin6-4, 6-3
2023-08-22vs SKY GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrett Fischer / Robert Brown vs Chauncey Staples / Arthur Turnbill5-7, 6-7
2023-08-15vs GAC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Brown / Brett Fischer vs Lei Gao / Erik Ratkelis7-5, 6-3
2023-08-14vs EM REDWon 20
W#1 SinglesBrett Fischer vs Ken Tronco1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWilliam Morris / Charles Roosevelt vs Mark Lindstrom / Kent Redding6-2, 6-3
2023-07-25vs SS-D GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesCharles Roosevelt / Jay Roberts vs Eric White / Steve Preston3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Zachary Bishop
published
4.25
Brett Fischer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.11
Daniel Washburne
published 4.5
4.09
Charles Roosevelt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
John Speer
published
3.73
Zachary Davis
published
Jay Roberts
published
Nicholas Morris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brett Fischer + Daniel Washburne1544% gamesnot enough data
Charles Roosevelt + Daniel Washburne5152% gamesnot enough data
Brett Fischer + Zachary Bishop314 matchesnot enough data
Brett Fischer + Charles Roosevelt213 matchesnot enough data
Zachary Davis + Charles Roosevelt123 matchesnot enough data
Charles Roosevelt + John Speer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zachary Bishop
17W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
4.44
4.5
Brett Fischer
34W–39L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Daniel Washburne
42W–42L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
4.11
4.5
Charles Roosevelt
25W–30L career · 3 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
4.09
John Speer
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
3.83
Zachary Davis
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Jay Roberts
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicholas Morris
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.