Teams

CM BLUE

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-28vs DTC GREENSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMark Fulford / Patrick Kehoe vs Jim Conley / Mick Milnark5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJoe Covell vs Bryan Auchterlonie4-6, 4-6
2024-05-13vs APR-U BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesPatrick Kehoe / Brent Levy vs Mark Raabe / AJ Pflanzer4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJoe Covell / Chad Olson vs Dan Daly / John Latta4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-05-06vs CM REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMark Fulford / Patrick Kehoe vs Joseph Mullen / Paul Tighe7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJoe Covell vs Andrew Kop4-6, 5-7
2024-04-29vs SKY BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesGordon Smith / Patrick Kehoe vs Eric Schlesinger / Marcelo Calle6-0, 6-3
2024-04-22vs SKY NAVYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGordon Smith / Patrick Kehoe vs Bentley Hodges / Todd Young1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesJoe Covell vs Tim Hutchens6-4, 6-3
2024-04-15vs WP-O NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesPatrick Kehoe / Nils Holum vs Scott Linton / Scott Meyer6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJoe Covell / Chad Olson vs Sean Meyer / Ryan Archibald6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
David Goetz
published 3
2.99
Patrick Kehoe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.98
Nils Holum
published
2.91
Gordon Smith
published
2.82
Brent Levy
published 3
2.77
Joe Covell
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Chad Olson
published 3
2.67
Mark Fulford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Kehoe + Gordon Smith6163% games+6.5% vs expected
David Goetz + Patrick Kehoe314 matchesnot enough data
David Goetz + Gordon Smith314 matchesnot enough data
Joe Covell + Patrick Kehoe213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
David Goetz
42W–27L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Patrick Kehoe
43W–33L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.99
Nils Holum
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
Gordon Smith
29W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Brent Levy
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Joe Covell
40W–46L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Chad Olson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Fulford
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.