Teams

Serve2Win

2021 Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over · Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-03-13vs FXBGLost 01
L#3 DoublesJena Olsen / Q Pennings vs Zachary King / Lorrie Roberts4-6, 2-6
2021-02-27vs FXBGLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Earley / Edward Busse vs Douglas Corbett / Catherine Stokes1-6, 2-6
2021-02-03vs FXBGLost 01
L#2 DoublesMiles French / Jena Olsen vs Gonzague de BONFILS / Marie Taylor3-6, 2-6
2021-01-30vs FXBGLost 01
L#3 DoublesKim Gudyka / Edward Busse vs Marie Taylor / David Todd1-6, 1-6
2021-01-23vs FXBGLost 02
L#2 DoublesQ Pennings / Kim Gudyka vs Owen Seely / Caitlin Bull6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMiles French / Laura Earley vs Romeo Cinco / Agnes Trice3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Jena Olsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.08
Laura Earley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.81
Kim Gudyka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Amy French
published 4
3.65
Ariel Selwyn
published 4
3.46
Q Pennings
published
3.31
Dorota Sipko
published 3.5
3.25
Edward Busse
published 3.5
Karna Hyman
published
Nancy Siems
published
Tang Subkanha
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jena Olsen
38W–71L career · 2 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Laura Earley
83W–52L career · 2 lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Kim Gudyka
55W–69L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Amy French
6W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Ariel Selwyn
7W–16L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
Q Pennings
6W–2L career · no lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Dorota Sipko
163W–91L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Edward Busse
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
Karna Hyman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Siems
7W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tang Subkanha
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.