Teams

Elings-Les Racquettes

Adult 55 & Over - SB · 7.0 combo Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-16vs SB LLW-LOVE-Nina GustasonLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Larrabee / Inna Taranchenko vs Lacy Selby / Amy Jakobson2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSherry Holland / Lauren Katz vs Marjie Kirn / Karakoz Williams6-0, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnne Mitchell / Rosanne Marquis vs Jaclyn Park / Tina Panos3-6, 3-6
2026-08-09vs SB LLW-LOVE-Nina GustasonWon 30
W#1 DoublesLori Travis / Inna Taranchenko vs Jaclyn Park / Tina Panos6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLauren Katz / Sherry Holland vs Samantha Ireland / Annie Dzierski6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLori Akers / Tracy Selbie vs Nina Gustason / Susan Rettig7-5, 6-4
2026-08-02vs SB LLW-LOVE-Nina GustasonWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Larrabee / Inna Taranchenko vs Amy Jakobson / Lacy Selby6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSherry Holland / Rosanne Marquis vs Susan Rettig / Julie Rosenthal7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLauren Katz / Karen Guardino vs Walden Bohnet / Colleen Rickman0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-07-26vs SB LLW-LOVE-Nina GustasonWon 21
W#1 DoublesLori Travis / Michelle Larrabee vs Jaclyn Park / Tina Panos7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Mitchell / Rosanne Marquis vs Samantha Ireland / Colleen Rickman6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPenny Wolfe / Inna Taranchenko vs Susan Rettig / Annie Dzierski4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-07-19vs SB LLW-LOVE-Nina GustasonLost 03
L#1 DoublesSherry Holland / Inna Taranchenko vs Annie Dzierski / Catherine Gautier6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLori Akers / Penny Wolfe vs Karakoz Williams / Walden Bohnet7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Mosby / Rachel Bishar vs Nina Gustason / Susan Rettig0-6, 2-6
2026-07-12vs SB LLW-LOVE-Nina GustasonLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne Mitchell / Tracy Selbie vs Catherine Gautier / Julie Rosenthal2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Katz / Susan Mosby vs Marjie Kirn / Karakoz Williams5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Guardino / Rosanne Marquis vs Annie Dzierski / Nina Gustason7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-05vs SB LLW-LOVE-Nina GustasonLost 12
L#1 DoublesLori Travis / Inna Taranchenko vs Amy Jakobson / Lacy Selby6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSherry Holland / Lauren Katz vs Nina Gustason / Samantha Ireland7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLori Akers / Penny Wolfe vs Catherine Gautier / Marjie Kirn2-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SB LLW-LOVE-Nina Gustason43111028207
2Elings-Les Racquettes34101128213

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Sherry Holland
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.33
Anne Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Inna Taranchenko
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Carol Tricase
published 3.5
3.22
Lori Akers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Michelle Larrabee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Tracy Selbie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Karen Guardino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Rosanne Marquis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.65
Rachel Bishar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lori Travis
published
Penny Wolfe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Mosby
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Veronica Buck-Tomm
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Larrabee + Lori Travis3347% games+2.1% vs expected
Susan Mosby + Rosanne Marquis0535% games−4.7% vs expected
Penny Wolfe + Lori Akers0639% gamesnot enough data
Inna Taranchenko + Rosanne Marquis1439% gamesnot enough data
Inna Taranchenko + Michelle Larrabee213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sherry Holland
13W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
Anne Mitchell
33W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Inna Taranchenko
104W–67L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Carol Tricase
6W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lori Akers
13W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Michelle Larrabee
44W–55L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Tracy Selbie
45W–52L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Karen Guardino
11W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Rosanne Marquis
66W–109L career · 4 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
Rachel Bishar
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%<1%
2.65
Lori Travis
24W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Penny Wolfe
6W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Mosby
2W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Veronica Buck-Tomm
2W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.