Teams

Shipley/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 3.0 Men 18 & over

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-04vs Romero/MemphisWon 32
W#1 DoublesRussell Smith / Jack Wellford vs Ian Takahashi / Eric Raymond6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesPaul Shifflet vs Kim Barkins2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesPeter Ryan / Nathan Evans vs Paul Johnston / Jose Romero1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesStephen Fly vs Razvan Marinescu6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHenry Hasbrouck / William Shappley vs Zach Minton / Torrean Johnson6-2, 6-2
2025-04-13vs Heard/MemphisLost 04
L#1 DoublesPeter Ryan / Jack Wellford vs Graham Heard / Matt Stark2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesNathan Evans vs Christopher Murabito2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Eason / Russell Smith vs Gareth Tasker / Joe Gleason7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLaurin Murk vs Peyton Clark3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-23vs Stukenborg/MemphisLost 05
L#1 DoublesLon McDurmon / Jack Wellford vs Xiangxia Liu / John Stukenborg1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesWalter Hoehn vs Scott Hirsch2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHenry Hasbrouck / William Shappley vs Michael Mohler / Alan Moore3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesStephen Fly vs Michael Agyemang2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Eason / Russell Smith vs Ryan Aghabeg / Huan Nguyen6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2025-03-09vs Andrews/MemphisLost 05
L#1 DoublesBrian Eason / Marion Gillespie vs Chris Bay / Tariq Hasan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPatrick Nabholz vs David Dachille2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRob Ratton / Joshua Shipley vs Jared Andrews / Corey Epps2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesPaul Shifflet vs Josh Bay0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNathan Evans / Henry Hasbrouck vs Daniel Bastardo Blanco / Chris Davenport3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Marion Gillespie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Walter Hoehn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.84
Jack Wellford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Wesley Phillips
published
2.78
Brian Eason
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
2.64
Henry Hasbrouck
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Patrick Nabholz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.59
Paul Shifflet
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.58
Peter Ryan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.51
Joshua Shipley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Rob Ratton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Stephen Fly
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.34
Nathan Evans
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Laurin Murk
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Lon McDurmon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
William Shappley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Shifflet + Nathan Evans4257% gamesnot enough data
Joshua Shipley + Marion Gillespie123 matchesnot enough data
Marion Gillespie + Peter Ryan213 matchesnot enough data
Jack Wellford + Patrick Nabholz303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marion Gillespie
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Walter Hoehn
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%14%
2.85
Jack Wellford
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Wesley Phillips
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Brian Eason
22W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Andrew Williamson
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Henry Hasbrouck
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Patrick Nabholz
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Paul Shifflet
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%26%74%
2.59
Peter Ryan
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Joshua Shipley
10W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
0%47%53%
2.51
Rob Ratton
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
Stephen Fly
6W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%83%17%
2.36
Nathan Evans
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.34
Laurin Murk
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lon McDurmon
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
William Shappley
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.