Teams

Trophy Husbands

2025 18 & OVER SPRING Saturday Men · 3.5 MEN

19 players · average NTRP 3.31 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-06-07vs SHAVANO PIRATESLost 13
L#1 DoublesHiran Perera / Don Rogers vs Ted Verrier / Mike Arch4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAndrew Syroney vs John Wood1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMike Kozub / Brian Dennis vs Matthew Muddiman / Calvin Morgan6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGraham Reeve / David Costello vs Paul Josephs / Paul Cardenas6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Matthew Sandidge
published
3.30
Stephen Dennis
published
3.29
Brian Kurth
published 3.5
3.27
Dan Weisel
published 3.5
3.26
Zach Kent
published
3.25
David Costello
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Brad Vogt
published 3.5
Don Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Douglas Richardson
published 3.5
3.23
Barry Maddix
published 3.5
3.22
Robert Sugg
published
3.17
Mike Kozub
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Andrew Syroney
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Graham Reeve
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.99
Hiran Perera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Brian Haines
published 3
2.84
Jared Rossi
published
2.81
Eric Bateman
published 3
Brian Dennis
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hiran Perera + Barry Maddix1535% gamesnot enough data
Eric Bateman + Brian Kurth123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Sandidge
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.71
Stephen Dennis
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Brian Kurth
20W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Dan Weisel
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Zach Kent
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
David Costello
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Brad Vogt
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Don Rogers
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Douglas Richardson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Barry Maddix
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Robert Sugg
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.22
Mike Kozub
11W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Andrew Syroney
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.13
3
Graham Reeve
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Hiran Perera
3W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Brian Haines
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Jared Rossi
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.84
3
Eric Bateman
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Brian Dennis
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.