Teams

Heimann/Memphis

Fall 2024 Flex Singles · 3.0 men

1 player · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-08vs Crawford/MemphisLost 01
L#1 SinglesChristopher Heimann vs Natrez Crawford3-6, 2-6
2024-10-19vs Kirlin/MemphisWon 10
W#1 SinglesChristopher Heimann vs Phillip Kirlin6-0, 6-3
2024-10-14Lost 01
L#1 SinglesChristopher Heimann vs Nathan Gray4-6, 3-6
2024-10-07vs Garner/MemphisWon 10
W#1 SinglesChristopher Heimann vs Bailey Garner6-2, 6-0
2024-09-30Won 10
W#1 SinglesChristopher Heimann vs Jeff Moser6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Christopher Heimann
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christopher Heimann
19W–6L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.