Teams

CLC:OutofService:McManus

2026 ME Adult 18 & Over Men · 3.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-06-13vs Apex:PaintTheLines:WelchLost 12
W#1 DoublesDaniel Kaiser / Patrick McManus vs Gregory Adey / Ryan Welch2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDavid Hart vs Julien Royer3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Fenton / Ben Christiansen vs Derek O'Neill / Christopher Myers3-6, 0-6
2026-06-13vs MRC:DeucesWild:QuirkWon 21
W#1 DoublesBen Christiansen / Patrick McManus vs Dwight Pitcairn / Ryan Aponte6-0, 7-5
L#1 SinglesRichard Serianni vs Gerald Quirk3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Hart / Peter Fenton vs Ken Thumith / Jeff Jones6-0, 6-0
2026-06-07vs MP:NotToTheUpGuy:HarrisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPeter Fenton / Richard Serianni vs Chris Ouellette / Greg Unfricht3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEdward Seidel / David Hart vs Duncan Persons / Oscar Tieman6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-30vs Apex:FreshBalls:ShurLost 12
L#1 DoublesKirk Hoppe / David Hart vs Andrew Shur / David Hilton6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPeter Fenton vs Subrata Das0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBen Christiansen / Patrick McManus vs Derek Gellis / Jim Hoppin7-5, 6-2
2026-05-30vs FF:PotvinWon 21
W#1 DoublesBen Christiansen / David Hart vs Peter Chadbourne / Matt Heffernan6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRichard Serianni vs Jamie Nonni6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesEric Siegel / David Light vs Paul Koroski / JAMES ODONNELL1-6, 1-6
2026-05-17vs Apex:FreshBalls:ShurLost 12
W#1 DoublesPatrick McManus / Kirk Hoppe vs Daniel Barton / David Hilton6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesRichard Serianni vs Jim Hoppin4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Hart / Peter Fenton vs Ross Wadland / Derek Gellis4-6, 4-6
2026-05-09vs FF:PotvinWon 21
L#1 DoublesEric Siegel / David Light vs Paul Potvin / Paul Koroski1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesPeter Fenton vs Jamie Nonni6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEdward Seidel / Ben Christiansen vs Kevin Crouse / JAMES ODONNELL6-3, 6-4
2026-05-09vs Apex:PaintTheLines:WelchWon 21
W#1 DoublesPatrick McManus / Daniel Kaiser vs Ryan Welch / Christopher Myers6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRichard Serianni vs Wilson McCourtney6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDavid Light / Ben Christiansen vs Tim Tyler / Steve Bizub2-6, 5-7
2026-05-02vs MP:NotToTheUpGuy:HarrisLost 12
L#1 DoublesRichard Serianni / Caleb Jones vs Gary DiPerna / Aaron Lockwood3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKirk Hoppe vs Oscar Tieman1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDaniel Kaiser / Ben Christiansen vs Chris Ouellette / Ryan Harris6-4, 6-1
2026-05-02vs MRC:DeucesWild:QuirkWon 21
W#1 DoublesDaniel Kaiser / Kirk Hoppe vs Ryan Aponte / John Shelley6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDavid Hart vs Dennis Johnstone3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRichard Serianni / Ben Christiansen vs Jeff Jones / Paul Spizzuoco6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Ben Christiansen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.05
Kirk Hoppe
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.89
David Hart
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.87
Daniel Kaiser
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Peter Fenton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Caleb Jones
published 3
2.75
Charlie Agnew
published 3
2.69
Richard Serianni
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.62
Eric Siegel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.52
Edward Seidel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
John Stirratt
published
2.41
David Light
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Patrick McManus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kirk Hoppe + Charlie Agnew314 matchesnot enough data
Peter Fenton + David Hart134 matchesnot enough data
Peter Fenton + Richard Serianni123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ben Christiansen
14W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.05
Kirk Hoppe
29W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
David Hart
11W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Daniel Kaiser
12W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
2.87
Peter Fenton
10W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Caleb Jones
11W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Charlie Agnew
18W–8L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Richard Serianni
6W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
2.69
3
Eric Siegel
3W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Edward Seidel
2W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.52
John Stirratt
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.42
3
David Light
7W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.41
Patrick McManus
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.