Teams

He.McCann40S

2026 Capital Fall Singles 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-31vs St.Suski40SLost 02
L#2 SinglesKelly Zargo vs Elena Ryzhikova1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesLisa Merritt vs Laura Olmsted1-6, 0-6
2026-08-24vs Ma.Steinhardt40SLost 12
L#1 SinglesHeidi McCann vs Mandy Steinhardt5-7, 5-7
W#2 SinglesMeghan Campbell vs Stephanie Black6-4, 7-6
L#3 SinglesLisa Merritt vs Lauren Gray1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1El.Nixon40S000000
2He.McCann40S000000
3La.McRee40S000000
4Ma.Steinhardt40S000000
5St.Suski40S000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
2.60
Heidi McCann
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.55
Kelly Zargo
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.53
Meghan Campbell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.42
Jeanna Hastie
published 2.5
2.21
Lisa Merritt
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Sarah Pearsall
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alise Fredrickson
64W–48L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Heidi McCann
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.60
Kelly Zargo
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55
Meghan Campbell
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53
2.5
Jeanna Hastie
31W–40L career · no lines in 2026
0%72%28%
2.42
Lisa Merritt
0W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.21
Sarah Pearsall
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.