Teams

Passing Shots 40 4.0

Winter Adult 40 & Over WeekEND · Mens 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.08 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-03-05vs Ball Busters 4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJP Jordan / Jay Brittain vs Michael Fontanini / Ferdinand Poon0-6, 6-7
2023-02-05vs SKO GREAT HILLS!Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJP Jordan / John Reynolds vs Anurag Kumar / Jon Simon0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-01-15vs Crushers 40Won 10
W#3 DoublesJP Jordan / William Cornforth vs Lawrence Rountree / Leo Guzman6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mens 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Drew Pinzur
published 4.5
3.81
William Cornforth
published
3.79
Mark Canales
published
David Burkle
published 4
David DeRoo
published 4
3.69
JP Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.67
Chris Ramser
published 4
3.63
Jay Brittain
published
3.57
Tim Loudermilk
published
3.55
Anthony Horsley
published 4
3.32
Nicholas Tracz
published
Tony Rankin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Ramser + Mark Canales4453% games+4.3% vs expected
Anthony Horsley + Drew Pinzur4651% games−7.5% vs expected
Chris Ramser + Anthony Horsley3442% games−12.0% vs expected
Chris Ramser + Drew Pinzur314 matchesnot enough data
Chris Ramser + Nicholas Tracz044 matchesnot enough data
Anthony Horsley + Nicholas Tracz224 matchesnot enough data
Anthony Horsley + William Cornforth224 matchesnot enough data
Jay Brittain + William Cornforth134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Drew Pinzur
34W–29L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
4.11
William Cornforth
29W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
Mark Canales
30W–37L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
4
David Burkle
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
David DeRoo
9W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
JP Jordan
124W–67L career · 8 lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Chris Ramser
39W–28L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
Jay Brittain
20W–27L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
Tim Loudermilk
21W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.57
4
Anthony Horsley
18W–33L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Nicholas Tracz
26W–26L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
Tony Rankin
13W–25L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.