Teams

Balls and Dolls

Mixed 18 & Over · 3.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN ARIZONA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-29vs DFL 18 +Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSelina Kelly / Steven Vesterdal vs Katherine Berry / Max Sloss1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNatalie Carey / KYLE KNUTSON vs Michelle Valvo / William Nolan1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCaroline Kacer / Kurt Kacer vs Chloe Kelly / Xuzhan Sun2-6, 4-6
2026-07-08vs DFL 18 +Lost 03
L#1 DoublesElyse Robb / Nick Robb vs Hannah Dillon / Chris Dillon4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNatalie Carey / KYLE KNUTSON vs Linda Barrows / David Brown4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKurt Kacer / Caroline Kacer vs Olympia Tinsley / William Nolan2-6, 4-6
2026-06-24vs Volley Parton 18+Won 21
W#1 DoublesSteven Vesterdal / Czarina Astengo vs Rocio Griggs / Joseph Powell6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAman Bains / Kim Usher vs Karl Coomler / Anita Mischuk6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Duemmel / Aaron Duemmel vs Michael Pleasants / Alisha Severson3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-06-23vs DFL 18 +Lost 03
L#1 DoublesElyse Robb / Nick Robb vs Hannah Dillon / Chris Dillon0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDana Goldstein / Adam Goldstein vs Katherine Berry / Max Sloss0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKurt Kacer / Caroline Kacer vs Linda Barrows / Xuzhan Sun5-7, 1-6
2026-06-03vs Volley Parton 18+Won 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Duemmel / Steven Vesterdal vs Belinda Paredes / Andrew Paredes7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Usher / KYLE KNUTSON vs Chelsea Fuller / Karl Coomler7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKerstin Harper / Aman Bains vs Rocio Griggs / Joseph Powell6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DFL 18 +4213510120
2Volley Parton 18+226617125
3Balls and Dolls1321021139

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Elizabeth Duemmel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.95
Kim Usher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Elyse Robb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Czarina Astengo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Natalie Carey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Dana Goldstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Selina Kelly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Kerstin Harper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Caroline Kacer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Steven Vesterdal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Duemmel
37W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
Kim Usher
36W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
Elyse Robb
29W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Czarina Astengo
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.88
Natalie Carey
14W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Dana Goldstein
15W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Selina Kelly
28W–61L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Kerstin Harper
10W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Caroline Kacer
8W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
Steven Vesterdal
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.