Teams

NAZ/Mraz/tri-level 18 & over/

2024 Adult Tri-Level - NAZ · Men 3.0, 3.5, 4.0

5 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTHERN ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-27vs GuzleyWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatthew Mraz / Andy Mraz vs Nick DeBiasse / Paul Miller6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAlex Rosenblum / AJ Mraz vs Blake Cain / Bob Guzley6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDamon Cademartori / Kevin Felix vs Eli Cohen / Michael Tyer2-6, 3-6
2024-10-27vs WebbWon 21
L#1 DoublesAndy Mraz / Matthew Mraz vs Keiji Iwai / John Malone0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAJ Mraz / Alex Rosenblum vs Steven Danner / Chadleo Webb6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKevin Felix / Damon Cademartori vs Craig Bearchell / Gary Vallen6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-10-26vs WebbWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndy Mraz / Matthew Mraz vs Keiji Iwai / John Malone6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAJ Mraz / Alex Rosenblum vs Chadleo Webb / David Maples6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDamon Cademartori / Kevin Felix vs Gary Vallen / Craig Bearchell6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-26vs GuzleyWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndy Mraz / Matthew Mraz vs Nick DeBiasse / Paul Miller6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAJ Mraz / Alex Rosenblum vs Blake Cain / Bob Guzley4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKevin Felix / Damon Cademartori vs Michael Tyer / Eli Cohen0-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men 3.0, 3.5, 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NAZ/Mraz/tri-level 18 & over/40939101
2Guzley135715110
3Webb134817118

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Matthew Mraz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Andy Mraz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
AJ Mraz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Alex Rosenblum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Kevin Felix
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Mraz + Andy Mraz30460% games+21.0% vs expected
AJ Mraz + Andy Mraz4158% gamesnot enough data
Alex Rosenblum + AJ Mraz314 matchesnot enough data
AJ Mraz + Matthew Mraz303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Mraz
39W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Andy Mraz
47W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
4
AJ Mraz
26W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Alex Rosenblum
6W–1L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kevin Felix
19W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.