Teams

Blossom 55+ Pichot

2024 55 & Over Fall Women - NA · 8.0 Tuesday Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TEXAS

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 8.0 Tuesday Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Margaret Neiheisel
published
3.60
Norma Trevino
published
3.56
Martha Bartlett
published
3.54
Constance Hassan
published 4
3.35
Lisa Holderness
published
3.26
Martha Cancelmo
published
Anne Cotner
published 3.5
3.23
Susie Keylon
published
3.22
Lynn Platteborze
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Mary Whittington
published
3.18
Nancy Hill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Carol Pichot
published 3.5
Emma Mathis
published
Jane Pelley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susie Keylon + Lynn Platteborze2635% games−3.9% vs expected
Nancy Hill + Carol Pichot0517% games−8.8% vs expected
Constance Hassan + Norma Trevino134 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Platteborze + Nancy Hill134 matchesnot enough data
Anne Cotner + Carol Pichot033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Neiheisel
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Norma Trevino
13W–27L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Martha Bartlett
4W–14L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Constance Hassan
9W–16L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
Lisa Holderness
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Martha Cancelmo
1W–12L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Anne Cotner
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susie Keylon
16W–22L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Lynn Platteborze
20W–60L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Mary Whittington
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Nancy Hill
7W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Carol Pichot
0W–28L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
Emma Mathis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jane Pelley
1W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.