Teams

Scarborough 1

2024 FALL A18&O Daytime Women · FALL 18&O 3.5W Friday

22 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-01vs ElysiumLost 01
L#2 SinglesLola Muhamedieva vs Shelley Finley5-7, 5-7
2023-11-17vs Scarborough 2Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLola Muhamedieva vs Catherine Teran1-6, 1-6
2023-10-13vs OlympicLost 01
L#2 SinglesLola Muhamedieva vs Lindsey Boyer4-6, 4-6
2023-10-06vs Wickertree 1Won 10
W#2 SinglesLola Muhamedieva vs Stephanie Morera6-2, 6-2
2023-09-15vs Racquet Club 1Won 10
W#2 SinglesLola Muhamedieva vs Laura Parker7-6, 7-6
2023-09-08vs ElysiumLost 01
L#2 SinglesLola Muhamedieva vs Mara Lorance2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for FALL 18&O 3.5W Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Natalia Sztryk
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.49
Marilee Hanna
published
3.48
Reem Ghanem
published
3.42
Rebecca Hill
published
3.38
Janet Conrad
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.34
Heather Hunter
published
3.33
Robin Larivey
published
3.29
Stephanie Demers
published
3.26
Brandi Burch
published 3.5
3.26
Sara Kate Hill
published
3.16
Sarah Blanda
published
3.13
Brooke Keaton
published 3.5
3.07
Beth Gittins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Carolyn M Johnson
published 3.5
2.94
Molly Carlin
published
2.86
Lisa Orsinelli
published
Lola Muhamedieva
usually #2 Singles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Lori Weiner
published
Maryam Kafi
published
Melanie Berman
published
Shelly Passias
published
Tish Coss
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Hill + Brandi Burch9077% games+15.3% vs expected
Reem Ghanem + Marilee Hanna18364% games+9.8% vs expected
Beth Gittins + Heather Hunter6458% games+9.3% vs expected
Heather Hunter + Brooke Keaton5259% games+7.9% vs expected
Heather Hunter + Marilee Hanna6359% games+7.3% vs expected
Sara Kate Hill + Marilee Hanna4553% games+7.1% vs expected
Sara Kate Hill + Brandi Burch4257% games+6.3% vs expected
Beth Gittins + Sara Kate Hill3353% games+5.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalia Sztryk
177W–146L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Marilee Hanna
256W–136L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
Reem Ghanem
143W–82L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.48
Rebecca Hill
105W–94L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
Janet Conrad
76W–78L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Heather Hunter
146W–83L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Robin Larivey
60W–40L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
Stephanie Demers
74W–121L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Brandi Burch
82W–58L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
Sara Kate Hill
102W–90L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
Sarah Blanda
40W–42L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Brooke Keaton
50W–48L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Beth Gittins
54W–78L career · 4 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Carolyn M Johnson
32W–73L career · type A · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
Molly Carlin
57W–81L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.94
Lisa Orsinelli
31W–54L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
Lola Muhamedieva
36W–55L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lori Weiner
18W–19L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maryam Kafi
14W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melanie Berman
21W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shelly Passias
8W–28L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tish Coss
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.