Teams

Englert/18s/3.5/SC

2026 Man · Cov Mixed 18 & Over

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Flight standings5 teams · Cov Mixed 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Englert/18s/3.5/SC7117719187
2Parvizian/18s/3.5/SC53141023192
3Walker-Walker/18s/3.5/PAC53141024209
4Caswell/18s/3.5/NC26101430232
5Raggio/18s/3.5/TCC1751940265

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Alysha Schroeder
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.52
Dane Landry
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
David Appe
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.35
Christine Vincent
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.32
Christine Last
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 24% · published 3.5
3.31
Carson Abrams
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Donald Rigaud
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Erin Englert
usually #2 Doubles 72%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Franco Centanni
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Jamie Quartano
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jordan Spinosa
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Kannon Otillio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Melisa Keo
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Rachel Mauti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Spencer Rossie
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Taylor Fernandez
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melisa Keo + Taylor Fernandez7260% gamesnot enough data
Franco Centanni + Dane Landry6070% gamesnot enough data
David Appe + Carson Abrams314 matchesnot enough data
David Appe + Rachel Mauti213 matchesnot enough data
Jordan Spinosa + Rachel Mauti303 matchesnot enough data
Spencer Rossie + Kannon Otillio303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alysha Schroeder
18W–15L career · type A · 28 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Dane Landry
22W–2L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
David Appe
10W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Christine Vincent
7W–8L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Christine Last
21W–12L career · 21 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Carson Abrams
23W–4L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Donald Rigaud
25W–7L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Erin Englert
26W–16L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Franco Centanni
21W–8L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jamie Quartano
52W–1L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jordan Spinosa
15W–4L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kannon Otillio
21W–4L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melisa Keo
19W–3L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rachel Mauti
17W–5L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Spencer Rossie
15W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Taylor Fernandez
11W–4L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.