Teams

Hancock, Heather

2022 Adult 18 & Over Summer 2.5W - 5.0 · 2.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-13vs HOA/Wachal/18&Over2.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesRhonda Gaffney / Rebekah Parish vs Katie Stevens / Rachel Denton4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKokovi Lawson vs Kim Schrag0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStacy Burbidge / Jennifer Simmons vs Kay Harper / Kia Stora7-6, 4-2
2022-06-06vs HOA/Wachal/18&Over2.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesRhonda Gaffney / Kokovi Lawson vs Rachel Denton / Kim Schrag3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRebekah Parish vs Margaret Glenn1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesStacy Burbidge / Judith VanSickle vs Rudruidee Karnchanasorn / Heather Richards6-1, 6-0
2022-05-23vs HOA/Wachal/18&Over2.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStacy Burbidge / Rhonda Gaffney vs Kim Schrag / Heather Richards7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKokovi Lawson vs Kylie Owens2-6, 4-6
2022-05-16vs HOA/Wachal/18&Over2.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesRhonda Gaffney / Heather Hancock vs Kay Harper / Kylie Owens2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKokovi Lawson vs Margaret Glenn0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Simmons / Rebekah Parish vs Heather Richards / Katie Stevens6-2, 6-1
2022-05-09vs HOA/Wachal/18&Over2.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesRebekah Parish / Kokovi Lawson vs Kim Schrag / Rachel Denton3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesHeather Hancock vs Kia Stora7-6, 0-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStacy Burbidge / Rhonda Gaffney vs Margaret Glenn / Katie Stevens5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Wachal/18&Over2.5W328717128
2Hancock, Heather237819138

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Heather Hancock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.80
Kokovi Lawson
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Rebekah Parish
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Rhonda Gaffney
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Stacy Burbidge
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Hancock + Kokovi Lawson134 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Burbidge + Rhonda Gaffney123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heather Hancock
51W–35L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.25
Kokovi Lawson
16W–26L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Rebekah Parish
7W–18L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rhonda Gaffney
4W–8L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stacy Burbidge
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.