Teams

MPRC-Wong/Chen

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.81 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Gregg Palmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Patrick Brewer
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.72
Donald Pettitt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.66
Ken Avenoso
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.63
Zhitong Chen
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.32
Jeffrey Gates
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Rick Wong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
David Larocca
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results6 ties
2021-07-17Lost 13
L#1 DoublesDonald Pettitt / Chuck Gooding vs Marc DeSantis / Mark Tryon6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKen Avenoso vs Jason Moore-Greenke5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJonathan Eames / Rick Wong vs Shaoping Lin / Francisco Rivera-Giusti6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesZhitong Chen / Patrick Brewer vs Ken Nichols / Michael Won6-4, 7-6
2021-07-11Won 40
W#1 DoublesChristian Walkenhorst / Gregg Palmer vs Rudy Martinez / Mark Stromme6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKen Avenoso vs William Hergenhan6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDonald Pettitt / Zhitong Chen vs Kit Johnson / William Campbell6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPatrick Brewer / Rick Wong vs Todd Eckelman / James Hockley6-3, 6-2
2021-07-10Split 22
W#1 DoublesZhitong Chen / Gregg Palmer vs Jonathan Barg / Donald Brenneman5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKen Avenoso vs Brian Posewitz7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatrick Brewer / Donald Pettitt vs William Campbell / Kit Johnson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Gates / David Larocca vs Mark Stromme / Bill Henderson6-0, 6-4
2021-06-18Lost 13
L#1 DoublesDonald Pettitt / Gregg Palmer vs Cristian Crisan / Jono Neher7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesZhitong Chen vs Ross Williams6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Larocca / Jeffrey Gates vs Jim Wheeler / John Christiaan6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKen Avenoso / Tod Johnston vs David Richardson / Min Lee6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-12Lost 13
W#1 DoublesZhitong Chen / Donald Pettitt vs John Auer / Carlin Jackson6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPatrick Brewer vs Howard Jaffe6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTod Johnston / Rick Wong vs Anthony Valenzuela / Michael Mayer6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Gates / Charles Kim vs Kevin Oloughlin / Ralph Miele6-3, 6-1
2021-06-05Lost 03
L#1 DoublesPatrick Brewer / Gregg Palmer vs Luke Filose / Vincent Lee7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKen Avenoso / David Larocca vs Patrick Maginnis / Agus Rusli7-5, 6-0
L#3 DoublesZhitong Chen / Rick Wong vs Justin Shull / Sushil Srivastava7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Gregg Palmer
182W–77L career
0%94%6%
3.92
4
Patrick Brewer
68W–59L career
1%99%0%
3.74
4
Donald Pettitt
43W–50L career
3%96%0%
3.72
4
Ken Avenoso
69W–67L career
4%96%0%
3.66
4
Zhitong Chen
76W–42L career
12%88%0%
3.63
3.5
Jeffrey Gates
102W–93L career
0%99%1%
3.32
3.5
Rick Wong
51W–50L career
1%97%2%
3.30
3.5
David Larocca
5W–20L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.