Teams

PMital-DUR

2026 Eno River Mixed 18 & Over · 18 & Over Mixed 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-27vs APlachco-DURWon 21
W#1 DoublesPatrick Grant / Tanya Sirivolu vs Matthew James / Zoe Dubrow6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrew Pham / Morgan Blount vs Luc Sanchez / Sindhu Shivaji6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesParv Mital / Morgan Stowe vs Katherine Leib / Rick Leib6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-07-13vs APerdue-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Martin / Tanya Sirivolu vs Lisa Spees / Andrew Perdue4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesParv Mital / Alexandra Ventura vs Parker Sheridan / Tiffany Holbrook6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAndrew Dinicola / Ana Maria Keating vs Karen Griffin / Mic Wallace2-6, 2-6
2026-07-06vs APlachco-DURWon 30
W#1 DoublesMorgan Blount / Emmanuel Oye vs Matthew James / Ana Plachco1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesParv Mital / Morgan Stowe vs Tyler Carroll / Jennifer Moore6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesPatrick Grant / Anna Hodges vs Luc Sanchez / Zoe Dubrow7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2026-06-26vs APerdue-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Martin / Tanya Sirivolu vs Aaron Hiller / Lisa Spees7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAndrew Dinicola / McKinsey Blount vs Karen Griffin / Mic Wallace4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesParv Mital / Anna Hodges vs Casey Black / Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-22vs APerdue-DURWon 21
L#1 DoublesAndrew Dinicola / Ana Maria Keating vs Parker Sheridan / Tiffany Holbrook7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEmmanuel Oye / McKinsey Blount vs Aneesh Kodali / Karen Griffin6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWilliam Martin / Alexandra Ventura vs Aaron Hiller / Brooke DeMarco6-1, 6-2
2026-06-15vs APlachco-DURWon 30
W#1 DoublesMcKinsey Blount / Andrew Dinicola vs Matthew James / Ana Plachco6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAndrew Pham / Morgan Blount vs Tyler Carroll / Jennifer Moore7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatrick Grant / Tanya Sirivolu vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-04vs APlachco-DURWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndrew Dinicola / Morgan Stowe vs Matthew James / Zoe Dubrow6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRaymond Xu / Charlie Trinco vs Tyler Carroll / Ana Plachco6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-06-01vs APerdue-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesMorgan Stowe / William Martin vs Karen Griffin / Aneesh Kodali3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesParv Mital / Ana Maria Keating vs Andrew Perdue / Lisa Spees6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEmmanuel Oye / Anna Hodges vs Parker Sheridan / Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 18 & Over Mixed 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1APerdue-DUR7119514168
2PMital-DUR5316824208

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Alexandra Ventura
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.46
Parv Mital
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
4.40
Andrew Dinicola
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.36
Morgan Blount
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.30
McKinsey Blount
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.28
Ana Maria Keating
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Raymond Xu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.21
Tanya Sirivolu
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.19
Charlie Trinco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Patrick Grant
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.15
Anna Hodges
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.84
Morgan Stowe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Emmanuel Oye
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
William Martin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

McKinsey Blount + Andrew Dinicola224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexandra Ventura
61W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
4.46
Parv Mital
26W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Andrew Dinicola
45W–44L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
4.40
Morgan Blount
8W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.36
4.5
McKinsey Blount
64W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Ana Maria Keating
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
4.28
Raymond Xu
21W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Tanya Sirivolu
93W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Charlie Trinco
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
Patrick Grant
19W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Anna Hodges
7W–14L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
4.15
Morgan Stowe
10W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
Emmanuel Oye
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
William Martin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.