Teams

Mannell Highland Country Club

2023 Sandhills Adult 40 & over · 4.5 Adult Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-05-07vs Martin - Lawn and Tennis 40+Won 10
W#3 DoublesKensley Edge / Margaret Barefoot vs Sushma Patel / Heidi Stevens6-1, 6-3
2023-04-23vs Martin - Lawn and Tennis 40+Won 10
W#3 DoublesAmber Ameredes / Kensley Edge vs Heidi Stevens / Robin McClymont6-3, 6-3
2023-04-16vs Martin - Lawn and Tennis 40+Won 10
W#3 DoublesKensley Edge / Margaret Barefoot vs Joy Martin / Jennifer Furie7-5, 7-6
2023-04-02vs Martin - Lawn and Tennis 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesGabriela Flores-Diaz / Kensley Edge vs Christina McKenzie / Kimberly Scruton6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Emily Schaefer
published
Amber Ameredes
published 4.5
4.21
Amy Perko
published 4.5
3.97
Michelle Porter
published
3.96
Megan Mannell
published
3.94
Marian Boyette
published
3.85
Kensley Edge
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.75
Laura Yarborough
published
3.74
Margaret Barefoot
published
Mary Morketter
published
Molly Alderman
published
Samantha Thompson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Perko + Margaret Barefoot4453% gamesnot enough data
Laura Yarborough + Kensley Edge6257% gamesnot enough data
Amber Ameredes + Margaret Barefoot3253% gamesnot enough data
Amber Ameredes + Laura Yarborough4165% gamesnot enough data
Megan Mannell + Laura Yarborough314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Schaefer
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
4.42
4.5
Amber Ameredes
19W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Amy Perko
20W–12L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.21
Michelle Porter
28W–14L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.97
Megan Mannell
24W–10L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.96
Marian Boyette
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.94
4.5
Kensley Edge
35W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
3.85
Laura Yarborough
48W–24L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
Margaret Barefoot
21W–19L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Mary Morketter
11W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Molly Alderman
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Samantha Thompson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.