Teams

CC - LLW - Soto Sczbecki 55+ 8.0M

2024 USTA 55 & OVER · CC 55 & Over M 8.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-11vs CC Sinsheimer SLOverheads 55+ 8.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Sczbecki / Fred Kelley vs Mark Minnoch / Bryan Crawford1-6, 6-7
2024-07-28vs CC Avila Lyle 55+ 8.0MWon 10
W#3 DoublesMark Sczbecki / Brian Bass vs John Lyle / Michael Ginn6-2, 6-0
W#1 DoublesFred Kelley / Mark Sczbecki vs Bryan Crawford / Mark Minnoch7-6, 6-0
2024-07-13vs CC Avila Lyle 55+ 8.0MWon 10
W#3 DoublesMark Sczbecki / David Johns vs Joe Caradonna / Howard Nicholson6-0, 6-1
2024-06-02vs CC Avila Lyle 55+ 8.0MWon 10
W#3 DoublesFred Mina / Mark Sczbecki vs Howard Nicholson / Stephen Wagner6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDaniel Lambert / Mark Sczbecki vs Scott Cleere / Mark Minnoch6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CC 55 & Over M 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Mark Sczbecki
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Daniel Lambert
published 4
3.77
Dana Evangelista
published 4
3.51
Andrew Weber
published 3.5
3.25
Stephen Royes
published
3.20
David Silberberger
published 3.5
Donald Blessen
published
Fred Kelley
published
Fred Mina
published
Hal Sweasey
published
Mark Boone
published
Randy Havens
published
Tai Martin
published
Tyler Corse
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Boone + Dana Evangelista123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Sczbecki
82W–17L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Daniel Lambert
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Dana Evangelista
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
3.5
Andrew Weber
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.51
Stephen Royes
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
David Silberberger
2W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
Donald Blessen
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Fred Kelley
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Fred Mina
29W–22L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Hal Sweasey
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Boone
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Randy Havens
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tai Martin
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tyler Corse
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.