← Teams

MAC-Morris

2020 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.35 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
John Magaddino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Jesse Inkpen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Fenn Bourland
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.26
Lisa Howlett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Amy Cooney
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Sarah Robertson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.07
Mark Meyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Melanie Morris
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
Jim Burns
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.43
Susan Sienko
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2019-11-23Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesLisa Howlett / John Magaddino vs Augustin Belindean / Blanche Sabo4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Robertson / James Thomas vs Wei Pan / Carol Adams6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Sienko / Jim Burns vs Charles Hahn / Claudia Belindean6-2, 6-3
2019-11-09Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesLisa Howlett / Jesse Inkpen vs Stephanie Harbell / Tony Chennault7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAmy Cooney / Jim Burns vs Julie Arness / Alex Harbell6-0, 6-3
2019-11-03Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesCharles Haugh / Sarah Robertson vs Gregg Palmer / Shannon Roarke6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJim Burns / Amy Cooney vs Richard Anderson / Janet Cathcart7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJesse Inkpen / Susan Sienko vs Lamone Voravongseng / Elizabeth Cook7-6, 6-4
2019-10-26Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesMark Meyer / Sarah Robertson vs Mike Mullen / Kristin Lyman6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmy Cooney / Charles Haugh vs John Judge / Anh Nguyen6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesFenn Bourland / Melanie Morris vs Patrick Trank / Jennifer Trank1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2019-10-12Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJim Burns / Lisa Howlett vs Danielle Cuenco / John Kin6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSusan Sienko / James Thomas vs ANTHONY PEPE / Jan Sonnenmair6-2, 6-1
2019-10-05Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJames Thomas / Amy Cooney vs Lei Zhu / Dao Her6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCharles Haugh / Sarah Robertson vs Helen Chen / Matt Zhou7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelanie Morris / Fenn Bourland vs Tianyi Gao / Evelyn Sun7-5, 6-1
2019-09-20Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesAmy Cooney / James Thomas vs Suki Birge / Rakesh Chirravuri6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJim Burns / Melanie Morris vs Aaron Bowman / Seona Zimmermann1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2019-09-08Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesLisa Howlett / John Magaddino vs Kelly Bartlett / David Lee6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelanie Morris / Charles Haugh vs Swathi Karlapati / Tony Moreno6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSusan Sienko / Fenn Bourland vs Kathi Gray / Gary Townsend6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
John Magaddino
84W–40L career
0%83%17%
3.48
3.5
Jesse Inkpen
45W–61L career
1%97%2%
3.30
3.5
Fenn Bourland
119W–67L career
1%99%0%
3.26
3.5
Lisa Howlett
31W–21L career · type S
6%91%4%
3.26
3.5
Amy Cooney
43W–50L career
4%96%1%
3.23
3.5
Sarah Robertson
72W–98L career
9%91%0%
3.13
3.5
Mark Meyer
37W–43L career
22%78%0%
3.07
3
Melanie Morris
25W–25L career
0%90%10%
2.94
3
Jim Burns
26W–30L career
not enough data
—
3
Susan Sienko
28W–77L career · type A
52%48%0%
2.43

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.