Teams

Wanna Play

2022 Adult 40 and Over League · 4.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.05 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-06vs MCC RoyalsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJill Kanahele / Tricia Wilstead vs Michele McLean / Sarah Schmidt3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesPetra Dupont vs Cathleen Nicoloff3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCynthia Feike / Ruby Matsui vs Erin Lepone / Lisa Poulsen5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAnne Burch / Debbie Montgomery vs Mino McLean / Abbie Murray3-6, 3-6
2022-02-26vs MCC RoyalsLost 13
L#1 DoublesJill Kanahele / Tricia Wilstead vs Mino McLean / Lori Robertson2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesPetra Dupont vs Mona Decrinis6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCynthia Feike / Maylynn Ikioka vs Erin Lepone / Lisa Poulsen2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrooke von Tempsky / Cynthia Funai vs Sarah Schmidt / Melissa Nickens2-6, 0-6
2022-02-06vs MCC RoyalsLost 13
W#1 DoublesCynthia Feike / Ruby Matsui vs Cathleen Nicoloff / Kimmie S Ouchi6-4
L#1 SinglesJill Kanahele vs Leslie Haughney5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKathy Kanemitsu / Petra Dupont vs Erin Lepone / Pamela Cooke2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRita Ingstad / Maylynn Ikioka vs Angie Williams / Michele McLean6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-01-29vs MCC RoyalsLost 13
L#1 DoublesCynthia Funai / Brooke von Tempsky vs Lori Robertson / Angie Williams1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJill Kanahele vs Leslie Haughney7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCynthia Feike / Deanna DiBiase vs Mino McLean / Pamela Cooke4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMaylynn Ikioka / Kathy Kanemitsu vs Erin Lepone / Lisa Poulsen0-6, 4-6
2022-01-23vs MCC RoyalsLost 13
L#1 DoublesCynthia Funai / Deanna DiBiase vs Cathleen Nicoloff / Kimmie S Ouchi1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJill Kanahele vs Mona Decrinis1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCynthia Feike / Ruby Matsui vs Lori Robertson / Michele McLean6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnne Burch / Maylynn Ikioka vs Melissa Nickens / Sarah Schmidt3-6, 1-6
2022-01-09vs MCC RoyalsLost 03
L#1 DoublesCynthia Feike / Tricia Wilstead vs Mino McLean / Pamela Cooke2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDeanna DiBiase vs Mona Decrinis3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Montgomery / Anne Burch vs Melissa Nickens / Sarah Schmidt1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Tricia Wilstead
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Ruby Matsui
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.04
Petra Dupont
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.90
Maylynn Ikioka
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.90
Deanna DiBiase
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.89
Jill Kanahele
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.85
Cynthia Feike
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Rita Ingstad
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Anne Burch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Debbie Montgomery
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Cynthia Funai
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Brooke von Tempsky
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Kathy Kanemitsu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rita Ingstad + Debbie Montgomery7457% games+18.4% vs expected
Jill Kanahele + Deanna DiBiase231259% games+8.0% vs expected
Cynthia Feike + Ruby Matsui17759% games+4.5% vs expected
Cynthia Funai + Deanna DiBiase7452% games+4.4% vs expected
Cynthia Funai + Anne Burch2346% games+4.3% vs expected
Maylynn Ikioka + Cynthia Feike2344% games+4.0% vs expected
Maylynn Ikioka + Petra Dupont9162% games+2.1% vs expected
Maylynn Ikioka + Jill Kanahele10454% games−0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Tricia Wilstead
33W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
4
Ruby Matsui
55W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
4.04
4
Petra Dupont
103W–66L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%38%62%
4.04
4
Maylynn Ikioka
109W–67L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Deanna DiBiase
144W–107L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Jill Kanahele
252W–166L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Cynthia Feike
88W–61L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
Rita Ingstad
63W–47L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Anne Burch
39W–25L career · 12 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Debbie Montgomery
154W–103L career · 8 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Cynthia Funai
93W–97L career · 8 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Brooke von Tempsky
58W–51L career · 2 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Kathy Kanemitsu
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.