Teams

HHTL55/Lane/Port Royal

55 & Over Combo · 8.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.20 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-25vs LLAS UPTA55C/Kim/ACACWon 21
W#1 DoublesDaniel Lieberman / Chris Hall vs Brian Okraska / Steven Szabo6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGlenn Sheaffer / Albert Day vs Brian Bartlett / Grant Hunter2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesTodd Stone / Steve Simone vs Kevin Hall / Steve Miller6-1, 7-5
2025-10-25vs GSTL55/Droseiko/StablesWon 30
W#1 DoublesDaniel Lieberman / Chris Hall vs Chris Leonard / Jay Drosieko6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTodd Stone / Tim Albert vs Paul Hendrix / Matt Angell6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAdam Ravens / Steve Simone vs Michael Mitchell / Robert Horvath6-3, 6-3
2025-10-24vs LLAS UPTA55C/Weiner/KrocWon 21
L#1 DoublesDaniel Lieberman / Steve Simone vs Douglas Meagher / John Dumke7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGlenn Sheaffer / Albert Day vs Christopher Chase / Jeffrey Wolf6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTodd Stone / Tim Albert vs Barney Pannell / Belton Thomason6-4, 6-4
2025-10-24vs LCTA55/Pettersen/MPRWon 30
W#1 DoublesTodd Stone / Tim Albert vs Paul Kaye / David Bruner4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGlenn Sheaffer / Albert Day vs Michael Stern / Frank Pettersen6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDaniel Lieberman / Steve Simone vs Michael Viljac / Bryan Koerber6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Daniel Lieberman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.11
Todd Stone
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.95
Albert Day
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.95
Adam Ravens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.87
Royston Tedder
published
3.83
Tim Albert
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Chris Hall
published 4
3.50
Chris Lane
published 4
Glenn Sheaffer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Steve Simone
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Lane + Albert Day4351% games−5.6% vs expected
Glenn Sheaffer + Albert Day213 matchesnot enough data
Todd Stone + Tim Albert303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Lieberman
14W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
4.53
Todd Stone
15W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
4.11
4
Albert Day
91W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.95
4.5
Adam Ravens
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.95
Royston Tedder
43W–28L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
Tim Albert
22W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Chris Hall
14W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Chris Lane
19W–12L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Glenn Sheaffer
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Simone
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.