Teams

NITA F 65CWDb Score-Michl/Prokaski

2026 NITA4 Fall Combo Daytime · NITA Fall Daytime 6.5 Combo Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 upcoming
Sep 16 12:00 PM
at NITA F 65CWDc Courts Plus-Mountcastle
Courts Plus
Sep 29 12:00 PM
Score Tennis and Fitness
Oct 6 12:00 PM
vs NITA F 65CWDc Courts Plus-Mountcastle
Score Tennis and Fitness
Oct 19 12:00 PM
Five Star Tennis
Oct 28 12:00 PM
at NITA F 65CWDc Courts Plus-Mountcastle
Courts Plus
Nov 10 12:00 PM
Score Tennis and Fitness
Nov 17 12:00 PM
vs NITA F 65CWDc Courts Plus-Mountcastle
Score Tennis and Fitness
Nov 30 12:00 PM
Five Star Tennis
Dec 2 12:00 PM
at NITA F 65CWDc Courts Plus-Mountcastle
Courts Plus
Dec 15 12:00 PM
Score Tennis and Fitness
Flight standings3 teams · NITA Fall Daytime 6.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA F 65CWDa Five Star-Delgrosso000000
2NITA F 65CWDb Score-Michl/Prokaski000000
3NITA F 65CWDc Courts Plus-Mountcastle000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Genie Prokaski
published
3.21
Karin Carney
published 3.5
3.00
Jennifer Moravek
published 3
2.97
Kimberly Michl
published
2.91
Nancy Dugan
published
2.84
Anne Pierpaoli
published 3
Wendy MacRi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Genie Prokaski + Jennifer Moravek12364% games+15.9% vs expected
Karin Carney + Nancy Dugan4847% games+2.1% vs expected
Genie Prokaski + Karin Carney224 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Michl + Anne Pierpaoli134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Genie Prokaski
60W–75L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Karin Carney
122W–100L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3
Jennifer Moravek
28W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
Kimberly Michl
19W–48L career · no lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97
Nancy Dugan
24W–43L career · no lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.91
3
Anne Pierpaoli
18W–26L career · type S · no lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
Wendy MacRi
13W–27L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.