Teams

PC-Happy Hour

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.58 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-10-09vs GAC-Sets MachineWon 21
L#1 DoublesEmerson Clark / Rebecca Allen vs Michelle Anslinger / Danny Anslinger1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDon Donais / Joyce Donais vs Erika Wilson / Robert Wing7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJames Kirkham / Jadee Kirkham vs Kiana Pielli / William Pielli6-1, 6-1
2021-10-09vs YTC-SmokeshowWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnthony Smith / Lisa Smith vs Ben Newman / Ashley Melcher6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDon Donais / Joyce Donais vs Eric Schultheiss / Cristeen Valicoff7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRandy Gable / Lindy Bentley vs Aaron McLean / Susan Morrison7-6, 7-5
2021-10-08vs NP-Spokane - LentiWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmerson Clark / Lisa Smith vs Joshua Cantu / Giang Bui6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJames Kirkham / Jadee Kirkham vs Mario Piergallini / Tressa Bogart1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesRandy Gable / Lindy Bentley vs Joseph Lenti / Rasa Morris6-2, 6-0
2021-05-02vs GAC-Sets MachineLost 01
L#1 DoublesEmerson Clark / Lindy Bentley vs Michelle Anslinger / Danny Anslinger3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-05-01vs CBRC-SamuelLost 01
L#3 DoublesJames Kirkham / Lindy Bentley vs Kristina Berg / Nikolla Qafoku3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Emerson Clark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
James Kirkham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Anthony Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Don Donais
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Joyce Donais
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Jadee Kirkham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Lindy Bentley
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Lisa Smith
published
Randy Gable
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Allen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Smith + Anthony Smith11174% games+19.2% vs expected
Joyce Donais + Don Donais21758% games+4.8% vs expected
James Kirkham + Jadee Kirkham10652% games−0.3% vs expected
Lindy Bentley + Randy Gable404 matchesnot enough data
Jadee Kirkham + Randy Gable033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emerson Clark
71W–43L career · 2 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
3.5
James Kirkham
53W–61L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Anthony Smith
78W–15L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Don Donais
104W–75L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Joyce Donais
69W–40L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Jadee Kirkham
42W–62L career · 2 lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
2.96
Lindy Bentley
25W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Smith
33W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Randy Gable
70W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rebecca Allen
14W–22L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.