Teams

SGV Flintstones-Hegelund-Flint Cyn/SA4

2023 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.56 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-09vs SGV Sugar and Slice-Nix-ATCC/SA3Won 10
W#3 DoublesHelle Hegelund / Antoinette Lessuk vs Jerri Johnson / Shelley McMahon5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesAntoinette Lessuk / Ruth McNulty vs Cristina Padron / Darlene Scott4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHelle Hegelund / Ayuko Siegel vs Mei Wong / Jing Feng6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHelle Hegelund / Antoinette Lessuk vs YenYi Lee / Dede Schneider6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesSusan Lee / Suzie Sarkisian vs Kerri Munson / Jill Mastroluca1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHelle Hegelund / Antoinette Lessuk vs Charlotte Pereira Reisch / Mara Watkins6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2023-10-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesHelle Hegelund / Antoinette Lessuk vs Kathleen McDowell / Lorena Manriquez7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2023-09-24vs SGV F-AB-Nuguid-WN/ SU8Split 11
L#2 DoublesSusan Lee / Ayuko Siegel vs Christiana Liu / Kathy Nguyen6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAntoinette Lessuk / Helle Hegelund vs Regina Gov / Meiling Chiu6-0, 6-0
2023-09-09vs LLW SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU8Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAntoinette Lessuk / Christina Kim vs Ennie Gonzaga / Tiffany Yu1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Lee / Suzie Sarkisian vs Kathleen Janisch / Keiko Kagan4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Esther Hwang
published 4
3.34
Feiming Morgan
published 3.5
3.26
Antoinette Lessuk
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Helle Hegelund
published 3.5
3.18
Ruth McNulty
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Ayuko Siegel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Suzie Sarkisian
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Gail Gerbode
published 3.5
3.05
Alison Shore
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Helle Hegelund + Antoinette Lessuk2746% games−5.6% vs expected
Antoinette Lessuk + Ruth McNulty5752% gamesnot enough data
Suzie Sarkisian + Antoinette Lessuk5354% gamesnot enough data
Suzie Sarkisian + Ayuko Siegel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Esther Hwang
17W–8L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Feiming Morgan
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Antoinette Lessuk
164W–156L career · 12 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Helle Hegelund
8W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Ruth McNulty
67W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Ayuko Siegel
64W–57L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
Suzie Sarkisian
59W–50L career · 2 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Gail Gerbode
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Alison Shore
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.