Teams

CDTA W 40&OW3.0 3.RCLB Sherman Sat 4 $22

CDTA 1Winter 40 & Over W · E

20 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 SinglesNicole Koleno vs Vanessa Harris6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLaura Breakstone / Julie Bell vs Cherrie Han / Paula Strickland6-7, 1-4
2026-03-28Split 11
L#1 SinglesNicole Koleno vs Daione Mitchell5-7, 3-2
W#3 DoublesJulie Gottshall / Frances Hopps vs Christina Fleming / Marta Kaminska3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesStephanie Rickmeier vs Stephanie Fishel6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJean Niemi / Jude Sharp vs Beverly Vacval / Julie Carr6-3, 6-1
L#1 DoublesJulie Bell / Juli Theo vs Katherine Stone / Erin McCarthy6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Scroggins / Julie Gottshall vs Chris Henderson / Lisa Charpentier6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNicole Koleno vs Beata Gaska-Aniolowski6-7
L#2 DoublesJean Niemi / Julie Gottshall vs Ally Alston / Andrea Sosa6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJamie Rauscher / Frances Hopps vs Shanna Palmersheim / Beata Bukowski6-1, 6-4
W#1 DoublesJulie Bell / Laura Breakstone vs Jody Sternberg / Tricia Lewis3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJamie Rauscher / Jing Lindsey vs Lauren Budz / Maggie Nodland5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesNicole Koleno vs Anita Kim6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJamie Rauscher / Julie Gottshall vs Jan James-Calvert / Abbey Cullen6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJude Sharp / Samantha Garrity vs Sara Ellis / Kafi Chase6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichelle Frankovich / Jing Lindsey vs Karin Steinbrueck / Jenifer McCartney6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 40&OW3.0 6.MTP Lewis Sat 2 $278023917180
2CDTA W 40&OW3.0 3.RCLB Sherman Sat 4 $2262211124206
3CDTA W 40&OW3.0 5.Gnvw Tromp Fri 7 $216223925212
4CDTA W 40&OW3.0 4.RT Cox Sun 4 $2762201229248
5CDTA W 40&OW3.0 1.MTC Brown-1 Sun 6 $33.544171531241
6CDTA W 40&OW3.0 7.MTB Shappert Sun 2 $2726141840295
7CDTA W 40&OW3.0 8.Wlmt Steinbrueck Sun 5 $2026112147315
8CDTA W 40&OW3.0 2.MTC Brown-2 Sun 6 $33.51782449338
9CDTA W 40&OW3.0 9.Herit Werts Sat 4 $251772553335

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Nicole Koleno
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.05
Laura Breakstone
published 3
3.02
Maribeth Corbett
published 3
3.00
Juli Theo
published 3
2.91
Samantha Garrity
published 3
2.90
Kim Vandegrift
published 3
2.90
Elham Abboud
published 3
2.80
Julie Bell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Pamela Sherman
published 3
2.80
Jean Niemi
published 3
2.78
Jamie Rauscher
published 3
2.75
Jude Sharp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Julie Gottshall
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Michelle Frankovich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Jennifer Scroggins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Jing Lindsey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Frances Hopps
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Margaret Keane
published
2.31
Stephanie Rickmeier
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Laura Gordon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samantha Garrity + Jennifer Scroggins7066% games+18.7% vs expected
Elham Abboud + Juli Theo7168% games+16.9% vs expected
Samantha Garrity + Laura Breakstone12262% games+11.3% vs expected
Laura Breakstone + Julie Bell10461% games+9.4% vs expected
Maribeth Corbett + Julie Bell9753% games+8.2% vs expected
Elham Abboud + Jennifer Scroggins2456% games+6.2% vs expected
Juli Theo + Maribeth Corbett13760% games+5.6% vs expected
Elham Abboud + Laura Breakstone4357% games+3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole Koleno
60W–39L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.11
3
Laura Breakstone
78W–37L career · no lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Maribeth Corbett
52W–35L career · no lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Juli Theo
76W–49L career · no lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Samantha Garrity
78W–56L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
2.91
3
Kim Vandegrift
71W–69L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Elham Abboud
76W–37L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.90
Julie Bell
40W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Pamela Sherman
75W–57L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Jean Niemi
41W–43L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Jamie Rauscher
45W–33L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.78
Jude Sharp
28W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Julie Gottshall
13W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74
Michelle Frankovich
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Jennifer Scroggins
35W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%1%
2.72
Jing Lindsey
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Frances Hopps
19W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
Margaret Keane
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
Stephanie Rickmeier
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
93%7%<1%
2.31
Laura Gordon
8W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.