Teams

OC NBTC - Christina Sat2

2024 OC Tri-Level Mixed · WE 5.0 - 4.5 - 4.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesTRAM LY / Grady Shon vs Kristine Kouyoumjian / Akshit Nisha Anish6-7, 4-6
L#1 DoublesQuynh Tran / TRAM LY vs Akshit Nisha Anish / Kristine Kouyoumjian3-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesTRAM LY / Daniel Tat vs Akshit Nisha Anish / Wenli Chen6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKevin Springer / Kari Keese vs Nisha Anish / Abhishek Nisha Anish7-5, 6-1
2024-08-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesDaniel Tat / Kari Keese vs Pat Papartassee / Patrick Chen6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WE 5.0 - 4.5 - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.57
Farrah Northcott
published
4.54
Jacky Visava
published
4.46
Jinna Johnson
published
4.45
Kari Keese
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.45
Blair Brzeski
published 4.5
4.43
Kristen Hoppe
published
4.37
TRAM LY
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.28
Daniel Tat
published 4.5
4.26
Grady Shon
published
4.19
Kevin Springer
published
4.08
Margaret Chang
published
3.98
Rachel Tran
published
3.95
Katie Huyen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.93
Kori Schillereff
published
Dany Chittamany
published 4
3.36
Lindsay Miller
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Farrah Northcott
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.57
Jacky Visava
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.54
Jinna Johnson
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.46
4.5
Kari Keese
95W–35L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
4.45
4.5
Blair Brzeski
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
4.45
Kristen Hoppe
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.43
5
TRAM LY
139W–109L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.37
4.5
Daniel Tat
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
4.28
Grady Shon
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.26
4.5
Christopher Contreras
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kevin Springer
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
Margaret Chang
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
4.08
Rachel Tran
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Katie Huyen
90W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.95
Kori Schillereff
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Christina Bennett
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Dany Chittamany
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lindsay Miller
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
3.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.