Teams

Burkwood - Carter

2024 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.70 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-23vs ACAC Jones/KastenLost 01
L#2 DoublesMelissa Allen / Jonathan Allen vs Toussaint Manley / Whitney Shelton7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2024-11-17vs Avalon George/LuchsingerWon 10
W#3 DoublesGreg Deeb / Melissa Allen vs Glenn Mizrach / Samantha Mier6-1, 6-1
2024-11-02vs Herm-OrskiWon 10
W#3 DoublesMelissa Allen / Jonathan Allen vs Kathleen Crotty / David Blankley6-3, 6-4
2024-10-20vs Belmont Spivamone - SpivackLost 01
L#1 DoublesGreg Deeb / Modestine Carter vs Jamie Cochrane / John Haggai3-6, 6-7
2024-10-13vs MTC Mixed MiraclesWon 10
W#3 DoublesJonathan Allen / Melissa Allen vs Gianni R Snidle / Kathleen Laroche6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-10-06vs Huguenot Park Stephens 7.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesModestine Carter / Chad Eldridge vs Alex Neuwelt / Lynette Villadelgado5-7, 3-6
2024-10-05vs MAC SnowLost 02
L#1 DoublesBret McFee / Modestine Carter vs David Brown / Kaitlyn Mejia6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJonathan Allen / Melissa Allen vs Zach Pettit / Kim Michael7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Theresa Hughes
published
3.71
Tommy Harris
published
3.65
Jordan McFee
published
3.56
Modestine Carter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Bret McFee
published 4
3.42
Jonathan Kovarcik
published
3.34
Melissa Allen
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Chad Eldridge
published 3.5
3.19
April Buckles
published 3.5
Elisa Grotjohn
published
Ethan Belote
published
Greg Deeb
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bret McFee + Jordan McFee213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Theresa Hughes
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Tommy Harris
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Jordan McFee
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Modestine Carter
219W–131L career · 3 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Bret McFee
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Jonathan Kovarcik
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.42
3.5
Melissa Allen
115W–116L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Chad Eldridge
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
April Buckles
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Elisa Grotjohn
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ethan Belote
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Greg Deeb
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.