Teams

BTA-CU BLUE

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 2.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-05vs NJ GREYLost 01
L#2 DoublesRich Gribbon / John Hoeffler vs Leon Gonzales / Jeremy Riggle6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-08-21vs RMTC BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesRich Gribbon / Stephen Richter vs Kyle Grage / Eric Sherman6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDean Rector / Ryan Hanneman vs William Dettmann / Harris Drantch0-6, 1-6
2023-08-14vs BRMST YELLOWSplit 11
L#1 SinglesRyan Hanneman vs Deepak APPU6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Hoeffler / Rich Gribbon vs Curt Hoffman / Richard Roberts6-0, 6-2
2023-08-07vs BRMST GOLDLost 01
L#2 DoublesDean Rector / Rich Gribbon vs David Kukafka / Jacob Wilson2-6, 2-6
2023-08-02vs NJ GREYLost 01
L#2 DoublesDean Rector / Stephen Richter vs Ernest Reece / Jeremy Riggle4-6, 4-6
2023-07-24vs LTA-Q BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohn Hoeffler / Ryan Hanneman vs Mark Millican / Richard Busser2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesStephen Richter / Rich Gribbon vs Steven Longenecker / Jeff Ilseman6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Stephen Richter
published
2.77
Grant Yamaki
published
2.59
Rich Gribbon
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.50
Ryan Hanneman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.49
Brad Begin
published 2.5
2.09
Dean Rector
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Gary McBride
published
John Hoeffler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dean Rector + Rich Gribbon21432% games−18.9% vs expected
Ryan Hanneman + Rich Gribbon4355% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Hanneman + Dean Rector1540% gamesnot enough data
Dean Rector + Brad Begin044 matchesnot enough data
Rich Gribbon + Brad Begin134 matchesnot enough data
Rich Gribbon + John Hoeffler134 matchesnot enough data
Brad Begin + Gary McBride224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephen Richter
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Grant Yamaki
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Rich Gribbon
40W–57L career · 5 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
2.59
2.5
Ryan Hanneman
40W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%49%51%
2.50
2.5
Brad Begin
7W–14L career · no lines in 2023
0%54%46%
2.49
2.5
Dean Rector
28W–75L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Gary McBride
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John Hoeffler
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.