Teams

Stewart 3.0 18 Sping23

2023 Decatur Spring Adult 18 and Over 2.5W - 5.0 · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.88 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
3.08
Andrea Stewart
published 3.5
2.91
Carol Irle
published 3
Briley Sandlin
published 3
Brittany Woodall
published 3
2.64
Kimberly Matson
published
2.50
Brooks Coley
published 3
2.41
Gail Roberts
published
2.35
Melissa Estes
published
2.34
Debbie Bailie
published 2.5
2.25
Angie Cushing
published 2.5
2.14
Marianne Huie
published
2.03
Belinda Rossi
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Bailie + Marianne Huie4249% games+3.0% vs expected
Debbie Bailie + Melissa Estes8256% games+2.4% vs expected
Marianne Huie + Melissa Estes224 matchesnot enough data
Briley Sandlin + Brittany Woodall134 matchesnot enough data
Angie Cushing + Belinda Rossi224 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Bailie + Belinda Rossi213 matchesnot enough data
Gail Roberts + Belinda Rossi033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Donna Jernigan Vehrs
35W–32L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Andrea Stewart
52W–48L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Carol Irle
37W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Briley Sandlin
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Brittany Woodall
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly Matson
43W–73L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
2.64
3
Brooks Coley
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
Gail Roberts
20W–18L career · no lines in 2023
0%73%27%
2.41
Melissa Estes
25W–28L career · no lines in 2023
0%85%15%
2.35
2.5
Debbie Bailie
35W–32L career · no lines in 2023
0%88%12%
2.34
2.5
Angie Cushing
17W–19L career · no lines in 2023
0%96%4%
2.25
Marianne Huie
22W–33L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.14
2.5
Belinda Rossi
10W–26L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.