Teams

Ace Athletics-MacDonald/Jones

2021 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 4.0W

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-12-09vs Sports Mall-JohnsonLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesKyra Dunshee / Kelle Jones vs Pamela Roberts / Kandice Taylor3-6, 5-7
2021-12-02vs RISE AC-OlsenLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesLeslie Murray / Kyra Dunshee vs Rosemary Glines / Mary Jane Glines6-4, 3-5, 0-1
2021-11-18Lost 01
L#2 Female DoublesSandie Hobson / Kyra Dunshee vs Whitni Skousen / Mindy Christensen2-6, 3-5
2021-11-11Lost 01
L#1 Female SinglesKyra Dunshee vs Kim Santiago4-6, 1-3
2021-11-04vs Sports Mall-Romney/AdamsonLost 01
L#1 Female SinglesKyra Dunshee vs Kathryn Tagge1-6, 4-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 4.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sunpro-Blackhurst/Allen4219513167
2Ivory Ridge-Boren/Owens42141023203
3Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks4215923180
4Sports Mall-DowDell/Lewis42141023177
5Sports Mall-Johnson42121225190
6Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek42111329194
7Ivory Ridge-Langston33141023192
8RISE AC-Olsen33121227220
9Sunpro-Harlan/Mortensen2491533204
10Ace Athletics-MacDonald/Jones2481634228
11Salt Lake Tennis-Ahrend1581634225
12Sports Mall-Romney/Adamson1571735221

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Becky Raymond
published 4
3.14
Kyra Dunshee
usually #1 Female Singles 40%, also #2 Female Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.88
Karen Borski
published
Karen Nickolaisen
published
Kelle Jones
published
Sandie Hobson
published
Vickie MacDonald
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Nickolaisen + Vickie MacDonald101348% games+5.1% vs expected
Sandie Hobson + Kyra Dunshee3942% games+4.8% vs expected
Kelle Jones + Becky Raymond192053% games+2.6% vs expected
Vickie MacDonald + Becky Raymond8550% games−3.1% vs expected
Karen Borski + Kelle Jones51042% games−3.4% vs expected
Karen Nickolaisen + Kelle Jones3445% games−5.5% vs expected
Sandie Hobson + Kelle Jones41244% games−7.6% vs expected
Vickie MacDonald + Kelle Jones31039% games−9.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Becky Raymond
81W–68L career · no lines in 2021
1%89%10%
3.83
3.5
Kyra Dunshee
96W–117L career · 5 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
Karen Borski
22W–64L career · no lines in 2021
82%18%<1%
2.88
Karen Nickolaisen
33W–59L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kelle Jones
56W–96L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandie Hobson
28W–73L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Vickie MacDonald
38W–65L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.