Teams

Transfer/Pending

2022 40&Over Women · Transfer

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Transfer have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Jenny Sladicka
published
2.86
Melissa Mayes
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.79
Patricia Bradney
published
2.78
Hilary Cloos
published 3
2.69
2.67
Patricia Dempsey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Gail Cadden
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Linda Paiva
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Mayes + Gail Cadden3550% games+3.6% vs expected
Patricia Bradney + Patricia Dempsey4154% games+3.4% vs expected
Melissa Mayes + Patricia Dempsey1538% gamesnot enough data
Gail Cadden + Patricia Dempsey134 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Bradney + Gail Cadden213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Mazzarella
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jenny Sladicka
32W–52L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Melissa Mayes
65W–88L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
Patricia Bradney
46W–49L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Hilary Cloos
52W–104L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Andrea Maya Feigelson
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Patricia Dempsey
35W–54L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Elizabeth McGahay
29W–55L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
2.58
2.5
Gail Cadden
15W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Paiva
13W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.