Teams

Sports Mall-McBroom

2021 USTA Adult 55 & Over · 6.0M

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-06-28vs South Jordan-Richie/ChristensenWon 21
W#1 DoublesDavid Rozsa / Jeff Squires vs Larry Richie / Nathan Spencer6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDon McBroom / Mike Easton vs Ronald Zimmerman / Randy Lindberg6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesThad Smith / Jeff Henderson vs Ryan Riches / Michael Christensen6-2, 6-4
2021-06-21vs South Jordan-Richie/ChristensenLost 12
W#1 DoublesDon McBroom / David Rozsa vs Edward Thomas / Mark Thomas7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJeff Henderson / Mark Miller vs John Leggett / Ronald Zimmerman6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRandy Fox / Javier Pinedo vs Tad Olpin / Michael Christensen2-6, 5-7
2021-06-14vs South Jordan-Richie/ChristensenWon 21
W#1 DoublesDean Bachman / Dev Mudaliar vs Craig Breinholt / John Leggett7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDon McBroom / Jeff Squires vs Ronald Zimmerman / Randy Lindberg6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesThad Smith / Randy Fox vs Nathan Spencer / Ryan Riches2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-05-24vs South Jordan-Richie/ChristensenWon 20
W#1 DoublesDean Bachman / Jeff Squires vs Larry Richie / Ryan Riches7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRandy Fox / Mark Miller vs Edward Thomas / Mark Thomas7-5, 6-3
2021-05-10vs South Jordan-Richie/ChristensenWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Rozsa / Dean Bachman vs Ronald Zimmerman / Randy Lindberg7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDon McBroom / Mike Easton vs Ryan Riches / Larry Richie6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesThad Smith / Randy Fox vs Michael Christensen / Louis Parks6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-McBroom4110511122
2South Jordan-Richie/Christensen1451023165

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
David Rozsa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Thad Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Don McBroom
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.58
Dean Bachman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Dev Mudaliar
published
Javier Pinedo
published
Jeff Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Mark Miller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Mike Easton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Randy Fox
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Rozsa + Jeff Henderson4162% games+7.1% vs expected
Dean Bachman + Thad Smith201154% games+6.8% vs expected
Thad Smith + Jeff Henderson181750% games+3.3% vs expected
David Rozsa + Thad Smith4258% games+3.1% vs expected
David Rozsa + Don McBroom3453% games−2.9% vs expected
Dean Bachman + David Rozsa6356% gamesnot enough data
Thad Smith + Randy Fox5167% gamesnot enough data
Mike Easton + Don McBroom3269% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Rozsa
180W–155L career · 3 lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
3.08
Thad Smith
116W–73L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%34%66%
3.05
3
Don McBroom
28W–31L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Dean Bachman
157W–120L career · 3 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
2.58
Dev Mudaliar
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Javier Pinedo
5W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jeff Henderson
101W–68L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mark Miller
29W–19L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mike Easton
15W–5L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Randy Fox
14W–8L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.