Teams

B9 MTC Meyer

2022 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.88 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-12vs B3 Burkwood CarterLost 01
L#3 DoublesManohar Viswanathan / Susan Zielinski vs Richard Clark / Donna Mourtzakis4-6, 5-7
2022-11-06vs B7 MAC Talamo 7.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSusan Zielinski / Lewis Farinholt vs Byron Roberts / Kasey Hammond2-6, 2-6
2022-10-29vs B5 ACAC Romero Double ShotsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTom Pollard / Susan Zielinski vs Darrell Eakes / Sonya Carman7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesChristopher Stidham / Pamela Stidham vs Miguel Romero / Julie Rison0-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-10-16vs B1 Avalon Ghita 7.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristopher Stidham / Pamela Stidham vs Andrei Fulga / Caroline Ogilvie5-7, 5-7
2022-10-09vs B8 acac Advantage Stephen’s 7.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLewis Farinholt / Pamela Stidham vs Jesse Smith / Kim Smith1-6, 2-6
2022-09-11vs B2 Salisbury KimSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristopher Stidham / Pamela Stidham vs Karen Franks / Dean Deaver4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTom Pollard / Susan Zielinski vs Gaurav Shrestha / Tamara Beck Jacquet6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Lindsay Hardage
published 4
3.67
Craik Goodspeed
published 4
3.54
Chris Pecci
published 4
3.53
3.48
Jeannie Langnau
published
3.47
Pamela Stidham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.21
Amanda Mayhew
published 3.5
3.15
Tracy Marks
published
3.12
Robin Meyer
published
3.09
Manohar Viswanathan
published
3.09
Susan Zielinski
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Kristen Fletcher
published
Lewis Farinholt
published
Tom Pollard
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lindsay Hardage
94W–63L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Craik Goodspeed
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Christopher Kochensparger
23W–27L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Chris Pecci
7W–11L career · type A · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Christopher Stidham
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
Jeannie Langnau
12W–21L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
4
Pamela Stidham
62W–94L career · 4 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Amanda Mayhew
10W–18L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Tracy Marks
12W–16L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.15
Robin Meyer
15W–23L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Manohar Viswanathan
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Susan Zielinski
125W–157L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Kristen Fletcher
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lewis Farinholt
3W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tom Pollard
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.