Teams

KY/BG/FEE

ADULT 18 & OVER · 4.0 WOMEN

7 players · average NTRP / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-19vs KY/OWB/GRAYLost 12
W#1 DoublesEliza Huffman / Kassie Smith vs Elizabeth Scheessele / Lauren Patmore6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSamantha Springs / Michelle True vs Lorien Appman / Sophey Jennings1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Isaac / Trina Rickard vs Brenda Clayton / Jennifer Raibley3-6, 1-6
2026-05-19vs KY/OWB/GRAYLost 03
L#1 DoublesEliza Huffman / Kassie Smith vs Lauren Patmore / Elizabeth Scheessele6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesPenney Baseheart vs Lorien Appman2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Isaac / Trina Rickard vs Brenda Clayton / Jennifer Raibley1-6, 2-6
2026-04-18vs KY/OWB/GRAYSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMartina Fee / Shannon Maglinger vs Julia Ray / Elizabeth Scheessele6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPenney Baseheart / Hannah Evans vs Kerry Bodenheimer / Brandy Harpenau3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesKassie Smith vs Lorien Appman6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTrina Rickard / Michelle True vs Lauren Patmore / Stephanie Gray2-6, 2-6
2026-04-18vs KY/OWB/GRAYLost 13
W#1 DoublesMartina Fee / Shannon Maglinger vs Lauren Patmore / Stephanie Gray6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTrina Rickard / Kassie Smith vs Elizabeth Scheessele / Julia Ray0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesPenney Baseheart vs Sophey Jennings0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle True / Kyra Keeton vs Kerry Bodenheimer / Brandy Harpenau0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Trina Rickard
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.69
Kassie Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.43
Penney Baseheart
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Michelle True
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Eliza Huffman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Martina Fee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shannon Maglinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Maglinger + Martina Fee5075% gamesnot enough data
Eliza Huffman + Kassie Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trina Rickard
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Kassie Smith
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Penney Baseheart
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Michelle True
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
3.30
Eliza Huffman
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Martina Fee
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shannon Maglinger
6W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.